Court Decision against Journalists seeking Transparency of MEP spending shows need for urgent reform
A consortium of investigative journalists took the European Parliament to Court for its refusal to provide public access to information about how Members of the European Parliament spend public funds, but today they lost the case.
This disappointing decision from the European Court of Justice was in some ways inevitable due to the fact that the European Parliament’s accounting systems are outdated and not done in a way that foresees public scrutiny of how the various Parliamentary Allowances are spent. Unfortunately the Court can only decide whether or not the administration’s decision to refuse access was correct, and cannot make recommendations about the need to reform the Parliament’s accounting systems.
We have long-known that these systems are outdated and have been calling for reform, particularly in areas where there is currently absolutely no oversight, such as with the General Expenditure Allowance. Of course, in this case, the Court could not force the Parliament to provide access to those documents because, since they do not even control that spending, they do not physically possess any documents about it.
European Court of Justice refuses journalists' request to see how #MEPs spend public money. If the European Parliament had better accounting systems, we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place. #transparency needed NOW! pic.twitter.com/Q6fI5mUIcG
— Pam Bartlett Q (@PamBQ) September 25, 2018
This content was blocked.
Do you want to display the content of the domain “platform.twitter.com”?
If you consent to the use of social plugins on our website, the Greens/EFA in the European Parliament processes your connection data (access data and terminal device data) and your user behaviour data as well as account data if you are logged in with a social media platform account and sets cookies on your terminal device for the purpose of external presentation of the company and external communication with interested parties.
The storage period of the above-mentioned data relating to you is for the duration of the browser session.
If you are logged into your Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, Spotify or SoundCloud account and use its social plugin, you enable the respective providers to assign your surfing behaviour directly to your personal profile. You can prevent this by logging out of your account.
The following processors are recipients of the data relating to you that is processed via the social plugins:
- Facebook - Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, 4 Grand Canal Place Grand Canal Harbour, Dublin 2, 2 Ireland, and Meta Platforms, Inc., 1 Hacker Way Menlo Park, California 94025, CA, USA.
- Instagram - Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, 4 Grand Canal Place Grand Canal Harbour, Dublin 2, 2 Ireland, and Meta Platforms, Inc., 1 Hacker Way Menlo Park, California 94025, CA, USA.
- X (formerly Twitter) - Twitter International Unlimited Company, One Cumberland Place, Fenian Street, Dublin 2, D02 AX07 Ireland, and X Corp., 1355 Market Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA.
- YouTube - Alphabet, Inc., 901 Cherry Ave., San Bruno, CA 94066, USA.
- Spotify - Spotify AB, Regeringsgatan 19, 111 53 Stockholm, Sweden, and Spotify USA Inc., 150 Greenwich Street, Floor 62, New York, NY 10007, USA.
- SoundCloud - SoundCloud Global Limited & Co. KG, Rheinsberger Str. 76/77, 10115 Berlin, Germany, and SoundCloud Inc., 71 5th Avenue, 3rd Floor, New York 10003, NY, USA.
- Giphy: Giphy, Inc., 416 W 13th St, New York, NY, USA.
- Streamovations, Pannestraat 42, 8630 Veurne, Belgium.
We use processors in the USA. The EU Commission has adopted a decision on an adequate level of data protection for the USA. The legal basis for this third country transfer is the transfer of data on the basis of an adequacy decision pursuant to Art. 47 EUDPR.
In accordance with Art. 23 EUDPR, you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie banner on the website or by sending an email to info@greens-efa.eu. A later withdrawal of your consent will no longer affect the lawfulness of the processing carried out up to that point in accordance with Art. 7 para. 3 sentence 3 EUDPR.
Further information can be found under link.
All this comes despite the fact that several political groups inside the European Parliament are already transparent about how they spend these funds - including Members of the Greens/EFA Group, which in turn has adopted its own transparency policy for the General Expenditure Allowance.
- Read our press reaction
- Read the European Court of Justice’s (ECJ) Press Release about the case
- Read the full ECJ ruling
