HUMAN CRISES CAN’T MEAN CORPORATE PROFITS – THE CASE FOR AN EU-WIDE WINDFALL TAX

Does the EU need a windfall tax? We’re facing an escalating food crisis, the war in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time unprecedented inflation rates have had devastating effects on the vast majority of the population. However, a few people and corporations have heavily benefited from them, which has only driven inequality even further. A recent study by Oxfam International highlighted that every 30 hours there was a new billionaire in the world. At the same time every 33 hours a million people drop into risk of extreme poverty.

Back in March 2022, we asked the Council and the Commission to come up with coordinated action to tax windfall profits. Windfall profits occur if big energy companies that had dramatically increased their profits in the context of the war. Following our request, the European Commission submitted a recommendation to Member States to provide an answer to these extraordinary profits and tax them accordingly. This would help those suffering the most from the energy crisis in the EU. But only a few of the member states have moved forward, and it has definitely not been enough. 

Tax the 1% who benefit from the crisis to help the 99% who suffer

It was a good first step, but we require stronger measures. What was once seen as an ‘energy crisis’ has now become a cost of living crisis – spearheaded by the food crisis.  The consequences of these crises can be and already are brutal for the most vulnerable. To make things worse, a quick look into the market and we can immediately see that the largest corporations and conglomerates in fields such as food, big pharma, gas and oil, energy, and tech (to name just some of the more relevant ones) continue to make unprecedented profits at the cost of the rest of society. Banks and corporations across the EU keep telling citizens that a raise in their wages would only drive inflation out of control. In reality, it is the vast increase in corporate profits this time that cause the inflation.

An EU-wide windfall tax for those that profit from the war

A Union that prides itself in having the people at the heart of its policies cannot and should not allow that the very few continue profiting at the expense of the 99.9%. For this, and given the extraordinary situation we find ourselves in, we call for the Member States and the Commission to show serious ambition. We need to establish a coordinated approach to effectively address the cost of living crisis caused by corporations. The EU needs to implement a retroactive one-off windfall profit tax of 50% to all of the corporations that have seen an dramatic increase in their profits since the start of the war. We can then use the resulting revenues as a direct subsidy to those most affected by the crisis. 

We can calculate the retroactive one-off windfall profit tax by looking at the average profits of the previous five years. After, we compare these profits with the profits made in fiscal year 2022. The windfall tax would then tax the increased profit at 50%. 

For a just transition we need to put money where people need it the most

These revenues should be used by Governments to help citizens in a just transition to renewable energies through direct subsidies. Besides taxing the excess profits at 50% we also ask companies to reinvest 25% of excess profits in renewable energies. 

It is time to get serious and tackle the power that corporations have over people. Food giants cannot be gouging the prices of food at the expense of citizens. Energy giants cannot be making  billions in profits when citizens have to choose between freezing or eating. It is time to take action. If the Commission is as serious as it says  about ending inequalities and fighting for a green future, then it should fight for a harmonised windfall tax. We also need follow-up proposals so we never face this situation again. Let’s use this opportunity to invest in a future where we finally show respect for the people and the planet. 

What is a windfall tax?

A windfall tax is a one-off tax that governments put on profits of corporations that have seen their benefits increase in a dramatic way at a time of crisis or need. This tax only focuses on the unusual extra profits and it does not affect the rest of the revenue of the company. The purpose is to redistribute excess profits for the greater social good.

Source: investopedia.com

Roe v Wade – How the US Supreme Court ruling affects abortion rights in Europe

On June 24th 2022, the abortion rights of millions of US Americans were taken away. The US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, putting an end to the constitutional right to abortion in all 50 States of America.

It is a landmark ruling that will have wide implications for gender equality, human rights and freedoms all across the globe.

Access to abortion will now be limited or illegal for millions of people in the US, in some cases even if the unwanted pregnancy is the result of rape, incest or brutality. This could set a precedent for countries returning to conservative abortion legislation, endangering the lives of people who seek abortion. 

When abortion is illegal and criminalised, pregnant people turn to unsafe measures to get rid of their unwanted pregnancies. And we all know that taking away legal access to abortion does not lead to fewer abortions. It leads to unsafe and dangerous abortions. The World Health Organization (WHO) noted that a staggering 45 per cent of all abortions around the world, are unsafe, making the procedure a leading cause of maternal death.

Could our abortion rights in Europe also be stripped away soon?

What do we know about the backlash on sexual and reproductive rights and health in Europe? And what can we do to defend abortion rights across the world?

We talked abortion rights with 6 feminists who are putting up a hell of a fight for sexual and reproductive freedom and justice in Europe. 

Abortion rights are under attack in the USA – but abortion is also under threat in Europe

Abortion is legal throughout most of the EU, though the circumstances under which the termination of a pregnancy is allowed vary according to each country.

In a huge win for our rights, last year the European Parliament declared access to safe abortion a human right. However, in practice, access to abortion varies widely across Europe because it is considered a matter for national governements. Let’s go on a tour of Europe and look at different cases of abortion rights within the EU – Ireland, Malta, Poland, Northern Ireland, and Germany.

The Greens/EFA have called to add the right to abortion into the EU Charter of fundamental rights. This July Plenary the European Parliament will debate the resolution.


“We are afraid that Meloni wants to go further and to maybe follow Orban’s steps and require women to be psychologically “consulted” before the procedure.

Benedetta Scuderi

Benedetta Scuderi is Co-spokesperson of FYEG (Federation of Young European Greens). We talked to her about the situation on sexual and reproductive rights in her home country, Italy.

After recent elections in Italy, the country will face a radical right coalition government under Giorgia Meloni’s Brothers of Italy party. People in Italy are starting to worry about what this means for abortion rights.

What should feminists across Europe know about the situation on abortion access in Italy?

Abortion in Italy is possible since 1978 due to the famous “194 law”. People in Italy can have an abortion until the 90th day of their pregnancy. After that it is only possible between the 4th and 5th month of pregnancy for medical reasons. There are specific reasons to ask for an abortion procedure and self-determination is not among them. However, law vagueness allows a wide interpretation for what reason accessing an abortion is possible in any case.

This law came in after years of fights between the feminist movement in Italy and the catholic groups requests. The compromise is clearly seen in two main aspects of this law, the possibility of conscientious objection for doctors to not offer an abortion procedure after a 7 day waiting period after consultation.

Lately, more and more doctors are not operating abortion using their objections right. The State is not implementing any solutions to always guarantee a minimum number of doctors per hospital who are available for abortion. Therefore, access to abortion is getting complicated, and the situation is even worse in more conservative regions, like those run by Meloni’s Fratelli d’Italia. They also prohibited abortions pills, further limiting the access to legal and save abortion.

What is at risk now, after the elections in Italy in September 2022?

After the elections there is a high possibility that the access to safe abortion procedures will be further undermined. First, what has been happening in those regions governed by conservatives might be happening in the whole country. This could lead to a strict limitation of access to abortion, especially for more vulnerable groups who might not have time and resources to move around the country to find a doctor who can provide a save abortion.

However, there is more. Throughout her campaign, Giorgia Meloni clearly stated she wants to properly implement the first part of the 194 law. This is the part where the law requires a consultation with a doctor 7 days before the abortion procedure.

We are afraid that Meloni wants to go further and to maybe follow Orban’s steps and require women to be psychologically “consulted” before the procedure. Even worse, her government might decrease the cases in which abortion is possible and subject the access to a medical approval. These are not just fears, this could happen at any time now and we can’t let it happen.

How can we in the European Parliament support your rights?

We would like to see a European declaration for save and legal access to abortion and we want it to be included in the EU Chart of Fundamental Rights. The EU should also set minimum standards for abortion accessibility and women safety for the Member States.

Access to safe abortion means access to health care. Access to safe abortion is a human right, and the EU should treat it like so. We must stay strong and united to win this fundamental fight.


Access to safe abortion in Ireland: “They will never, ever stop coming for our reproductive rights. And we will never, ever stop fighting for them.”

Tara Flynn, Irish actress, author and abortion rights activist.

Tara Flynn is an Irish actress, author and pro-choice activist. She has been a vocal campaigner for reproductive rights and the repeal of Ireland’s 8th amendment.

What is the situation for abortion access in Ireland?

Here in Ireland, we voted by a landslide to repeal the constitutional ban on abortion in 2018. However, the pushback from anti-choice quarters remains. There still isn’t wide enough access. People with problems in later term are still having to travel. There’s an unnecessary three day wait, which serves no purpose other than to assume that the person making this very personal decision doesn’t know their own mind. 

I think the most important thing people should know is this: even though a majority of people in Ireland understand that abortion has always been needed and always will be – and they very clearly voted to reflect that – conservative forces will always be coming for our bodily autonomy and reproductive rights. We need to stick together, keep the pressure on our politicians, and not let our guard down for a second.

Are you afraid the Roe v Wade US Supreme Court ruling will impact the abortion rights in Ireland?

There’s a long-standing relationship between anti-choice forces here in Ireland and those in the US, even if it’s not always overt. They fought our campaign for abortion rights tooth and nail. I have no doubt they feel emboldened by the overturning of Roe. But we’re not going anywhere – certainly not back to punishing pregnant people in need and removing their privacy and dignity. 

The pro-choice community in Ireland – what kept your abortion rights activism going in challenging times?

The pro-choice community in Ireland really came together and held each other up. I used to say, “It’s not a sprint. Nor is it a marathon. It’s a marathon we’re being asked to do at a sprint.” What I meant by that is, we all need to do our part and we can’t leave it up to “them over there” or “activists”. By taking any action – even supporting a friend through a crisis pregnancy – you’re an activist. In that way, we need the race to be a relay: one person takes an action today, someone else the next. It’s far too easy to burn out. That’s why we have to do this together.


Taking away the right to abortion in the US is an attack on our rights. But it will hit women of colour, disabled women and other marginalised communities the most

Orla O'Connor

Orla O’Connor is the Director of National Women’s Council (NWC), the national women’s membership organisation in Ireland.

What’s happening in the US is an attack on women’s rights. It’s about control and power over women’s bodies and women’s lives. As with all reproductive rights restrictions, it is the most marginalised who will bear the brunt of this. It is women of colour, disabled women and pregnant people. Those who don’t have the resources to travel to states that do provide the care.

In Ireland, we know that restrictions in our legal framework and poor geographical coverage of services are also having a disproportionate adverse impact on marginalised communities here. I hope the US ruling will strengthen our collective resolve to demand that the ongoing Abortion Review tackles the legal barriers and brings our abortion care in line with WHO guidelines

Lessons from the US Supreme Court Ruling Roe v Wade – We cannot be complacent

The lesson from the US is that we can’t be complacent. We have to express solidarity with those directly impacted by the Supreme Court decision. We must continue to effectively organise and advocate for true reproductive rights here in Ireland.

Support and solidarity with a broad range of fellow reproductive health and rights advocates has been one of the most sustaining and fulfilling parts of my career to date. It’s so important to have that support system and to work together to achieve the change we know is urgently needed.


Poland imposes a near total ban of abortions in 2020 – Millions take on the streets for their abortion rights

Magdalena Gałkiewicz

Magdalena Gałkiewicz is a women’s rights, animal rights and climate activist, and Secretary General of the Polish Green Party.

Could you describe the situation of abortion access in Poland right now ?

In practice, abortion is prohibited in Poland. 

It is banned by the hands of the Polish Catholic Church and right-wing populists in power. They want to please the religious extremists and the international network of the Tradition Family and Property (TFP) sect. The TFP has a strong position in Poland thanks to the ruling right-wing populist coalition. 

The fight for freedom and human rights is a struggle between two realities. The reality of an authoritarian, patriarchal-religious-conservative past with an eco-feminist, sustainable and empathetic future. 

Abortion bans in Poland and now in the US – how are they connected?

The overruling of Roe v Wade worries me because the impact on the change of law in the US was made by the same international sect as in Poland. And it is both rich republicans from the US and Russian oligarchs who finance this Tradition Family and Property (TFP) sect.

If we do not resist together, the ban will spread from the US and Poland to other EU countries. It will spread through the EU, starting in Central and Eastern Europe.

Let’s support each other. Let’s talk boldly about our abortion experiences. Let’s not be afraid. Let us unite – the thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of us. Together, we will be strong!
Magdalena Gałkiewicz

But let’s also remember that feminism is not only about the right to abortion and the right to gender equality. It is a fight for our future. We have to show solidarity with our sisters from the global south. It is a fight for the next generation and for the future of our planet. 


Malta upholds a total ban on abortion – Each action for abortion rights counts!

Mina Jack Tolu

Mina Jack Tolu is a committee member of the European Greens, and the International Secretary of the Green Party in Malta.

What should green feminists across Europe know about the situation on abortion access in Malta?

Malta has completely banned abortion. And, like in other countries where abortion is illegal, all this does is exacerbate the divide between rich and poor. Criminalising abortion doesn’t stop them from happening. It turns it into a luxury service that many can never afford. This is especially true when people have to go abroad to access a safe abortion.

Malta’s pro-choice movement is growing year after year. However, it takes time to fight a status quo set in the 1850s. The first step for many activists has been to question the society we grew up in. We’ve had to unlearn years of inadequate education on sex and sexual health. We then had to challenge the taboo and stigma in our own families and communities. This takes hard work.

What are the struggles of abortion rights activists in Malta and how can we support them?

The best advice I have received for mobilising and campaigning came from the trans rights movement. It encouraged me to look comprehensively at the attacks on reproductive rights across our struggles. Reproductive rights are often undermined by those wishing to uphold and maintain racist, classist, and ableist structures in society. 

And I will contrast this with the worst advice: Being an openly pro-choice politician in Malta is political suicide. Unfortunately, many of my pro-choice colleagues in other parties continue to follow this advice. With time, I hope they find the courage to step up and make their voice heard.

Fighting for access to abortion in Malta – things to be aware of 

When it comes to self-care in activism, it is important to recognise and respect your own boundaries. I am one of the first publicly pro-choice politicians in Malta. This is why I faced a lot of hate online which triggered anxiety around public speaking and recording video messages. I am only starting to overcome it now, three years later. But it didn’t stop my work behind the scenes. I kept helping to build networks and push for policy change within the Greens.

Activism for sexual self-determination would not be possible without building a community. Just like drops in water, each individual action has a ripple effect impacting more people than we could ever know. So keep fighting!


Germany changes the law  –  The ban on ‘abortion advertising’ is finally history

Terry Reintke is a Member of the Greens/EFA Group

Terry Reintke is a Member of the Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament from Germany.

Let’s end with some stories of hope. For many years, the German Greens were fighting to abolish paragraph 219a of the German criminal law. On the same day as the Roe v Wade Court ruling took away the US right to legal abortion, Germany came one step closer to save and legal access to abortion.

It was an ugly legacy of the Nazi regime aiming to prevent women from getting information on the medical procedures of an abortion. In recent years, anti-choice activists had been using this paragraph to sue doctors who had published information about how to end an unwanted pregnancy on their websites. But those brave doctors, led by Kristina Hänel, fought back and went to the highest German Court – and they won. 

Thanks to their courage and persistence, the Greens (as part of the German government) were able to put an end to this unbearable situation, Doctors won’t be criminalised anymore for providing the most basic service and information to women who want to undergo an abortion.

Legal access to abortion in Germany – still a long way to go
Malena Meneses Gelpi

Malena Meneses Gelpi is a medical doctor, surgery resident, doula and visual artist based in Berlin.

In Germany, abortion itself remains an illegal procedure – and it is still a long and winding road to get to a point where you are provided with an abortion. Many still face huge obstacles in getting the information and unconditional support they need when facing unwanted pregnancies. Just days ago, the prohibition against the “commercialisation” of abortion was taken down, giving millions of people safe access to life saving information. For me as a physician, it’s a relief to see brave colleagues being decriminalised and witness a step forward for women* inside a misogynist system. 

Are you worried that the US ruling will impact abortion rights in Germany?

Just like the United States of America, we too are strongly influenced by outdated so-called Christian values that try to dictate a woman*’s role in society. I think it should alarm us how fast we have adjusted our lives around the achievements of feminist fights and glories from the past. On the other hand, we can also see how dangerously fast they can be taken out of our hands. We should look at our North American sisters* with concern and feel the urge to be even more vocal about self-determination concerning our bodies and the right to decide on having an abortion. 

We have to keep fighting for women*’s liberation on a daily basis: at the workplace, in your neighbourhood, inside your biological family, but also in the family you choose. But we can’t be fighting all the time – we need to be healthy and alive for the long journey towards gender equality and sexual freedom.


“Northern Ireland has shifted from the most restrictive regime on abortion to one of the most liberal overnight. But we need to stand firm to defend those rights.”

Clare Bailey

Clare Bailey is a Northern Irish politician and Leader of the Green Party Northern Ireland. She has actively supported people seeking abortion and survivors of sexual violence throughout her career.

What did you think when you heard about the Roe v Wade Supreme Court ruling on abortion rights in the US?

There has been a global outpouring of condemnation over the recent ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Roe v Wade. But evidence shows we cannot ban abortions, we can only ban safe ones.

We know that banning abortions will not stop them from happening. It will instead stop safe abortion from happening and put women’s lives and livelihoods at risk. This is what the evidence shows us.
Clare Bailey, Leader of the Green Party Northern Ireland
What is the situation of access to safe and legal abortion in Northern Ireland and do you think the Roe v Wade ruling will affect it?

Northern Ireland has shifted from the most restrictive regime in the world, to one of the most liberal overnight. While this was a good news story, without the proper commissioning of services, women will still struggle to access the full healthcare they need. 

As our laws changed, the world was in lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We were told to stay at home to save lives. Regarding abortion services at that time, we saw access to telemedicine open up and women being allowed to self-medicate at home. We have known for a very long time that these pills – mifepristone and misoprostol, used to perform medication abortions – are some of the safest medicines we have. The WHO has listed them as essential medicine. But in Northern Ireland, our Health Minister did not make this service available. During the pandemic, we continued to force women to travel to England. 

The U.S. has dealt a brutal blow to women. And this will, of course, embolden anti-choice advocates everywhere. You can hear it in the recent words of Conservative MP, Danny Kruger, speaking about bodily autonomy, saying: “in the case of abortion, that right is qualified by the fact that another body is involved… this is a proper topic for political debate,”. 

The UK needs to pay attention and stand firm that there will be no roll back on our hard won rights. 

Five ways to rise for our rights to safe and legal access to abortion in the EU and around the world

Here are 5 ways we as a pro-choice abortion activists inside and outside politics can defend our rights:

  • Start a petition: In Finland, Naisasialiitto Unioni coordinated a citizen’s initiative to loosen restrictions around abortion access. The #OmaTahto petition aims to update the country’s old legislation, dating back to the 1970s. They reached the threshold of signatures in record time, and the proposal will be discussed in Parliament in the fall of 2022. 
  • Join local protests and donate to causes: If you can, join protests and support your local feminist organizations in the pursuit of reproductive justice. Start a fundraiser to donate money to charities. Find a local protest under our instagram post and add your city in the comments!
  • Vote for a woman or run for office: The case of Roe v. Wade raises critical questions about politics, power and decision-making. According to the Los Angeles Times, male senators accounted for 91% of the votes to confirm the five justices who overturned Roe v. Wade. Women’s participation in politics in the United States remains extremely low: only 24% of senators are women!

    Diversity and women’s meaningful participation in politics makes a huge difference in the lives of women and all minorities. Many local, national and international organisations support women and gender-diverse people in their campaigns – from the very first steps, all the way to election night (and beyond!) – such as the Dutch NGO Stem op een Vrouw (Vote for a woman!).

    Reach out to your local organisation or party to find out how you could run or, alternatively, support another candidate!
  • Go the constitutional route: French lawmakers have proposed a bill to enshrine abortion rights in the country’s constitution, according to a statement by two members of parliament. Feminist leaders in Belgium are looking into similar options. Could this be an option in your country?
  • Go big, or go home – Yes, we are talking about the EU: French President, Emmanuel Macron, has flirted with the possibility of introducing the right to abortion in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

    Earlier this month, EU lawmakers voted in favour of a resolution criticising the US Supreme Court’s draft decision to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade. For the second time in less than a year, the European Parliament took a stand on how abortion is handled across the Atlantic. In October 2021, the European Parliament called for calls for repeal of the abortion restriction in Texas. This week, the plenary will vote for a third resolution on the topic, the specifically calling for including abortion rights in the fundamental rights charter.

    Join the Greens in their fight for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights and stay up to date on our campaign on how to make change at the European level, sign up here.

Period tracking apps and the right to privacy – what can you do to protect yourself?

With the recent developments on the restriction of the right to safe and legal abortion in the US, users of period tracking apps could risk being tracked when logging a missing period or other symptoms of pregnancy. This data could then be used to even prosecute pregnant people or people looking for abortion in the US. We have gathered some ways to protect yourself and your private data, that you can share with your friends and family, especially when they are based in the USA:

  • Use a cycle tracker that does not share data with advertisers and third parties
  • Do not use your browser to research abortion possibilities while being logged in on Google or Facebook on the same device
  • Use a browser add-on that blocks third party cookies
  • Do not send SMS to doctors or abortion clinics, always use end-to-end encryption messengers

Stop the greenwashing – 10 reasons why this EU Taxonomy is not green at all

✍️ SIGN OUR PETITION:

With the EU Taxonomy the European Commission wants to label nuclear energy and gas as “green”. Leading up to the decisive plenary vote in July 2022 we will be covering different angles as to why the Greens/EFA in the European Parliament will not accept this greenwashing. So here are 10 reasons why gas and nuclear energy are not sustainable.

1 Labelling gas and nuclear energy “green” investments would mean financing Putin’s war
Wednesday, 06 July 2022

Today on Wednesday 6 June we are facing the extremely important vote on whether gas and nuclear label get a sustainability label or not.

Labelling it a green investment would mean financing Putin’s war. According to a recent study by Greenpeace, Russia would earn € 4 billion more per year from an expansion of gas capacity, meaning 32 billion by 2030.

While thanks to nuclear power, Rosatom, which is a Russian state company with strong commercial ties to the European nuclear industry, would secure 500 billion in additional investments.
Gas has become more than ever a source of energy insecurity and geopolitical risk for our continent.
It is no coincidence that the current greenbond market excludes gas and nuclear power. Including them would be counterproductive for banks and financial institutions. They need long-term certainty on the environmental impact of their investments.


Everyone knows that nowadays the price of renewables is far lower than gas. And new nuclear power plants take 15-20 years from planning to operation. Also, nuclear power plants are estimated to be 4 times more expensive than new onshore solar or wind power plants.


The ferocious lobbying of Russian companies such as Gazprom and Lukoil to include gas and nuclear power in the EU taxonomy has been amply demonstrated. This is not a coincidence, considering that the EU Taxonomy would be a gift to Putin to continue to violate the human rights of the Ukrainian people.

As the Greens/EFA in the European Parlament, we have no doubts: gas and nuclear power must stay out of the taxonomy.

2 The Taxonomy Lies
Tuesday, 05 July 2022


How is it possible that things always get messed up in the end? The EU taxonomy is (or was) a great and heroic idea to define – with a science-based approach – what is a green investment and to end the discussion on greenwashing in the financial sector once and for all. But we ended up with a severely watered-down version that does not serve its own purpose. This is no longer a taxonomy that will help to accelerate the financing of a green transition.

Enough has been said about labeling gas and nuclear as “sustainable activities”. It is completely wrong. Not science-based but vested-interest based. It also highlights a design flaw in the taxonomy, which was addressed by the Platform on Sustainable Finance in its March report. We should clearly distinguish sustainable, intermediate and neutral activities, with intermediate activities being activities that need to continue to improve their environmental performance levels over time. Natural gas might qualify for that.

And that is the relevant discussion: instead of concentrating on the green label, investments might more quickly move to a more sustainable direction if harmful activities were labeled. After all, which investor would think it is a good idea to invest in activities that are officially labeled as “harmful”? 

But for now, it is a lie if someone claims the taxonomy will speed up the energy transition. It speeds up vested interests. And sadly, we have politics to blame for that.

3 Taxonomy will make the cost of living crisis worse, not better
Friday, 01 July 2022

CIARÁN CUFFE


Diverting investment towards gas and nuclear, and away from truly green energy sources, will exacerbate the cost-of-living crisis in Europe and increase energy poverty. That is because, while we are still dependent on expensive energy sources like gas and nuclear, households will remain exposed to extreme price volatility in the energy market.

Promoting gas in infrastructure as green also promotes the falsehood that inefficient and faulty gas boilers are the “sustainable” choice. In reality, they will lock vulnerable households into energy poverty and an unsustainable future.

Meanwhile, prices of clean, renewable energies are hitting record lows. By choosing to invest in these technologies, we will accelerate our transition towards a highly energy-efficient and fully renewable-based economy. This will reduce energy costs and consumption of fossil fuels. We will also see gains in EU energy sovereignty, energy security, and come closer to meeting our climate targets. For individual households, a fully renewable-based economy means lower energy bills, lower prices, and a healthier environment to live in. It will lift millions out of energy poverty, and will shield every household in Europe from price shocks in the fossil energy markets. We have the technologies and the know-how to make Europe a fully renewable-based economy. So let’s say no to higher prices and more fossil fuels by voting down the EU Taxonomy, and make this economy a reality!

4 Public scrutiny is essential – citizens’ opinion on the greenwashing of fossil gas and nuclear cannot be ignored
Wednesday, 29 June 2022


When proposing to include investments in fossil gas and nuclear in the EU Taxonomy, the European Commission failed to respect the basic principles of public participation in the adoption of EU legislation.

European Institutions have established tools and rules to ensure that the EU decision-making process is fair, transparent and open to citizen’s feedback. These tools include the Better Regulation Guidelines and the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law Making. Both were neglected by the Commission in the process which led to the proposal including gas and nuclear in the EU Taxonomy of sustainable investments.

Both these instruments foresee an obligation for the European Commission to open a 4-week public consultation before adopting proposals. This consultation period should give citizens, civil society and any interested stakeholder the right to express their opinion on the decision in question. However, the EU Commission decided not to hold this consultation before proposing to classify gas and nuclear as sustainable with the EU Taxonomy.

The inclusion of gas and nuclear in the EU Taxonomy would have enormous consequences on the environment, on the future of our energy system, on the market, on investors, on public funds and on citizens. It is therefore essential that it is subject to public scrutiny. The draft to label gas and nuclear energy as green has received strong criticism from citizens, civil society, academics, policy makers and investors. All these voices have been ignored. One more reason to vote this Delegated Act down!

5 There will be no European energy sovereignty with the Greenwashing of gas and nuclear
Monday, 27 June 2022


There will be no European energy sovereignty by greenwashing gas and nuclear.
At the moment the EU is highly dependent on fossil and uranium imports. We import 70 percent of our hard coal, 90 percent of our gas demand, 97 percent of our oil demand, and even 100 percent of our uranium.

From Russia alone, the EU imports 40 percent of its gas and 20 percent of its uranium demand. Besides the import of gas and fuel rods, Europe is highly dependent on Russian infrastructure and spare parts for running nuclear power plants, primarily in Central and Eastern Europe.

This is why President Putin will pop champagne bottles if the EU Taxonomy will not be stopped by the European Parliament.

We need a massive expansion of renewables and an immediate energy efficiency program so Europe can achieve a sustainable energy supply and turn off Putin’s money tap.

Including nuclear and fossil gas into the taxonomy, even when labelled as “transitional” or “enabling”, will set these technologies on equal footing with solar and wind.

Instead of giving incentives to pump money into technology that is harmful to our climate the European Commission should steer its energy into fulfilling the European Green Deal.

This is why we will vote down the EU Taxonomy!

#NotMyTaxonomy

6 Follow the science – to save the climate fossil gas needs to stay in the ground.
Thursday, 23 June 2022


To fight climate change, we need clarity and leadership on the best way forward. But the European Commission is doing the exact opposite. They have proposed to label investments in fossil gas and nuclear power as “green investments” in the EU taxonomy. This goes against science. It gives the wrong signal to private investors and diverts European public money. We desperately need to promote energy savings and renewables. This is why this EU taxonomy must be rejected. 

I won’t even waste time explaining again why nuclear power is just about the most expensive and dangerous energy in the world. As for gas – the International Energy Agency itself calls for a halt to all new fossil fuel projects. 

Even the European Commission’s own estimates state that the European Union must have reduced its gas consumption by at least 36% by 2030, and that we have to be completely off gas within a decade. Gas cannot therefore be given a green label! 

The EU is caught in a contradiction: it pushed for the inclusion of the end of fossil fuel subsidies in the Glasgow Climate Agreement. On the other hand, by designating gas as “green”, it will stimulate investment in gas. This would have a disastrous global impact and would turn its back on the objective of keeping global warming to 1.5°C. 

Boosting gas investments is not a transitional measure, but a full-scale attack on the climate. Together, let’s reject the taxonomy’s delegated act on gas and nuclear!

7 The European Commission itself says: Only clean energy should be labelled as sustainable.
Thursday, 02 June 2022

Thomas Waitz MEP Greens/EFA

According to the European Commission’s proposal itself, investments should only be labeled green if they firstly contribute to climate mitigation and adaptation and secondly do no significant harm

But if there is one thing certain, then that The EU-Commission’s proposal to include gas and nuclear energy production in the Taxonomy regulation does significant harm to the consumer’s trust by including nuclear energy in the list of investments that are considered sustainable.

And here’s why: We simply cannot build a circular economy on the uranium fuel cycle. Uranium is, per definition, a limited, non-renewable resource. In addition, nuclear energy is already the most expensive form of energy according to recent studies. And that is even when we are excluding the unforeseeable costs to future generations for storing and destroying the waste. 

Looking at the enormous risks that nuclear energy poses to life on earth, we cannot switch to investing into renewable energy fast enough. Building new nuclear power plants takes time and valuable resources. Projects currently under construction are already facing massive delays. It can take several decades before a new nuclear power plant is operational. We don’t have that kind of time. Let’s encourage companies to invest into clean and renewable sources of energy instead of labeling investments into nuclear energy as “green”.

Therefore we are going to “do no significant harm” by objecting to the European Commission’s proposal on the EU Taxonomy.

8 No time to waste – The EU Taxonomy should be promoting truly sustainable investments now.
Wednesday, 01 June 2022


To keep our planet liveable we need billions of investment towards sustainability. But the EU is at risk of failing in its massive task of steering these investments towards those economic activities that we need in the next decades to survive.

At the last climate summit in Glasgow, the world moved slowly but surely in the direction of phasing out fossil fuels. With the decision made by the European Commission, the EU now risks turning the clock backwards by  including both fossil gas and nuclear power in the taxonomy for sustainable investments. In the upcoming weeks, the European Parliament has a last chance to stop this.

The EU Taxonomy is increasingly used as a reference for European and even global investments. Classifying fossil gas and nuclear energy as ‘sustainable’ would strike at the foundations of virtually all EU policies to increase the sustainability of investments. 

We are facing a climate crisis, a cost-of-living crisis and the war in Ukraine. This means that the EU urgently needs to become independent of Russian uranium and gas. Artificial incentives to invest in expensive nuclear and dirty fossil energy at the expense of renewables and other sustainable sectors is the last thing we need. 

The European Parliament has the power to make sure that the EU Taxonomy remains an instrument for promoting truly sustainable investments. We need to block the attempt to paint gas and nuclear energy green.

Let’s stop the greenwashing. Stop this Taxonomy now!

9 The EU Taxonomy is a financial and environmental threat to younger generations. We will not accept it!
Wednesday, 01 June 2022

Martina Comparelli

Fridays for Future climate activists Martina Comparelli & Marco Pitò criticise the EU Taxonomy

Climate activists all around the world agree: the European Commission cannot get away with a misleading EU taxonomy on sustainable investments.

On January 13th, we youth activists from all over Europe protested with two handcrafted fossil gas plant cooling towers provided by Greenpeace. They were painted green, the same way that the European Commission is greenwashing gas plants with this EU Taxonomy.

We still have a chance to stop this. Until the beginning of July we need to convince at least 353 Members of the European Parliament to block this EU Taxonomy.

Join in and help us to spread the word. Come to a protest or organise one, write to your MEPs. And never lose hope. We will not accept this scam. Not for our generation and not for the ones to come.

Stop the EU Taxonomy – We need to stick to the Paris Agreement and invest in a green future instead
Wednesday, 01 June 2022

The Greens/EFA Climate Campaigner, Hedvig Sveistrup

In December 2021, the European Commission adopted a list of criteria for sustainable investment, the EU “Taxonomy”. With the Taxonomy Regulation, the European Commission wants to set a standard for which investments made in the EU are sustainable and which ones are not.

This EU Taxonomy for sustainable investments should ensure that that EU countries and companies are encouraged to invest climate friendly. This way these investments would be more in line with the EU’s Green Deal and the climate targets of the Paris Agreement.

But this list has a major error: the Commission’s announcement also classified investments in gas and nuclear power as sustainable. And this is despite us all knowing that fossil gas and nuclear energy cause considerable harm to the environment and contribute to global warming.

This is greenwashing of energy technologies that are harmful to climate and to the environment, and it must be stopped!

Leading up to the plenary vote in July we will be covering different angles as to why the Greens/EFA in the European Parliament will not accept this greenwashing, this EU Taxonomy.

We need the EU to encourage truly green investments and renewable energies to move away from fossil gas and energy dependence and to stop the climate crisis.

✍️ Sign our petition to stop the greenwashing and follow us here for weekly updates on the EU Taxonomy.

Nuclear energy is not sustainable – So let’s not label it as such

Nuclear energy is not without risks and places a burden on future generations, as accidents with huge consequences in Fukushima and Chernobyl show. Nuclear waste is dangerous for generations to come. Uranium mining and milling, and the storage and disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent fuel do not respect the taxonomy law requirement to prevent significant harm to any environmental objective. 

Let’s rather invest in making energy use more efficient and in the development of renewable energy. Renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, lead to much faster greenhouse gas reductions. 

How will we achieve climate neutrality? Not with the EU Taxonomy

New investments in fossil activities such as gas-fired power plants are incompatible with the goal to achieve carbon neutrality in 2050 as the International Energy Agency (IEA) has recently confirmed. We have to stop fossil investments already from the year 2022 onwards to keep in line with the 1,5 degree temperature goal.

Why is the EU then encouraging private gas investments when at the same time the EU rightly called for the ending of fossil subsidies at the COP26?

Stop this Taxonomy and sign our petition above!


LA SALUTE MENTALE È SINONIMO DI RICCHEZZA – MA ALLORA PERCHÉ I GIOVANI IN EUROPA NON HANNO NESSUNA DELLE DUE?

Il mondo è in fiamme. Una pandemia globale infuria. L’economia si muove al rallentatore. Non ci sono posti di lavoro. I giovani non possono permettersi di lasciare la casa dei genitori o di vivere da soli. Leggere le notizie è deprimente. Non c’è da stupirsi che i problemi di salute mentale tra i giovani(dai 15 ai 24 anni) siano raddoppiati in un solo anno. Tre dei nostri stagisti Greens/EFA – Marco, Carolina e Timothy, giovani provenienti da tutta l’UE – ci raccontano come sono stati colpiti dalla disoccupazione, dalla crisi degli alloggi e dal cambiamento climatico, e il conseguente l’impatto sulla loro salute mentale.

Insieme al Covid-19, un’altra pandemia invisibile ha travolto il mondo dall’inizio del 2020. Stiamo parlando della crisi della salute mentale giovanile. Da quando è iniziata la pandemia, i giovani hanno infatti dal 30% all’80% di probabilità in più di sperimentare la depressione o l’ansia, secondo un rapporto dell’OCSE (Organizzazione per la cooperazione e lo sviluppo economico).

Le cause dei problemi di salute mentale tra i giovani sono varie. E, naturalmente, ogni giovane ha i propri fardelli personali. Tuttavia, è chiaro che la nostra generazione debba affrontare alcuni problemi comuni, di enorme gravità. Per questo motivo, in questo blog osserviamo più da vicino tre questioni che i giovani devono affrontare in Europa – la crisi climatica, la disoccupazione e la crisi degli alloggi – chiedendoci: com’è affrontare questi problemi come giovane nell’UE? E come possiamo proteggere la nostra salute mentale?

Mentre leggi, perché non ascolti la nostra playlist sulla salute mentale? Danziamo insieme sui nostri problemi, che fa bene! 

DOVER LOTTARE PER UN ALLOGGIO: QUANTO INFLUENZA LA SALUTE MENTALE DEI GIOVANI?

Carolina photo

Carolina viene da Madrid, in Spagna

Carolina ha 23 anni. Abbiamo fatto una chiacchierata con lei e ci ha raccontato quanto la difficoltà per aggiudicarsi un alloggio al giorno d’oogi influenzi la nostra generazione, aggiungendo alcune sue riflessioni sul conseguente impatto sulla salute mentale dei giovani.

Che impatto ha la crisi degli alloggi in Europa sui giovani?

Trovare una casa è molto più difficile che in passato, soprattutto per i giovani. Mentre i nostri genitori o nonni alla nostra età probabilmente avevano già un lavoro e una casa, noi riusciamo a malapena a pagare l’affitto ogni mese.

Ho avuto la fortuna di vivere in quattro paesi: Spagna, Francia, Belgio e Regno Unito. In tutti, ho visto come i miei amici abbiano sofferto lo stress e l’incertezza di non sapere dove avrebbero vissuto il mese successivo. O trovi qualcosa ad un prezzo accessibile o, se no, devi prendere le tue cose e tornare a casa.

I prezzi elevati e un mercato immobiliare in rapida evoluzione rendono il trovare un posto economico in cui vivere una vera e propria lotta. Spesso ci sono fin troppi requisiti necessari prima di poter firmare un contratto: assicurarsi un contratto di lavoro, trovare un garante, risparmiare per poter pagare un deposito… delle barriere che molti giovani semplicemente non riescono a superare. Per esempio, a Lione, ho vissuto in un alloggio privato per studenti. Anche lì, mi hanno chiesto informazioni sullo stipendio dei miei genitori negli ultimi due anni e necessariamente due garanti. Nonostante io fossi una studentessa con una borsa Erasmus.

In Spagna, ho anche visto le diverse realtà del vivere in grandi città come Barcellona e Madrid. L’affitto medio mensile in queste due città è dell’82% più caro che nel resto del paese. Dovendo anche pagare per la loro istruzione, i miei amici che vengono a Madrid da altre città difficilmente riescono a trovare una stanza ad un prezzo accessibile,

In media, i giovani costituiscono il 20-30% del numero totale dei senzatetto nella maggior parte dei paesi europei. Questi numeri sono aumentati negli ultimi anni e la situazione è solo peggiorata durante la pandemia.

Anche i più fortunati, che possono permettersi di pagare l’affitto, devono destinare più del 50% del loro stipendio all’alloggio. Il che rende difficile arrivare a fine mese. Gli stage non pagati o i bassi salari aggiunti all’alto costo dell’affitto nella maggior parte dei paesi europei rendono il tutto un circolo vizioso dal quale non si ha scampo.

I giovani sono intrappolati: non siamo in grado di firmare un contratto d’affitto da soli, non possiamo permetterci l’affitto e non possiamo risparmiare per la nostra futura casa.

E la condivisione di un appartamento? È questo il futuro degli alloggi per i giovani?

Condividere un appartamento con altre cinque persone è diventata la cosa normale per chi ha 20 o 30 anni. In città come Madrid, Barcellona, Parigi, Amsterdam o Bruxelles, l’affitto medio mensile di un appartamento è di circa 1000€, mentre lo stipendio medio dei giovani in Spagna o in Italia è di 1200€. Non è difficile fare i conti. L’unico modo per diventare indipendenti è condividere un appartamento.

Condividere un appartamento è spesso definito come “un’esperienza che arricchisce” o “vivere in un ambiente multiculturale”. E spesso viene chiamato co-living. Questa dicitura cerca di romanzare la situazione molto precaria in cui si trovano tanti giovani in tutta Europa. In realtà, vivere con degli estranei non è una mera preferenza personale – ma la nostra unica opzione.

Cosa c’entra la crisi degli alloggi con la salute mentale?

Il costo dell’affitto, l’ansia di non trovare un posto dove vivere o di dover contare sul sostegno finanziario dei propri genitori sono paure condivise da molti giovani in tutta Europa.

L’incertezza rende quasi impossibile per i giovani anche solo pensare di avere figli o comprare una casa senza un lavoro stabile, cambiando di fatto le nostre principali scelte di vita, facendoci spesso sentire intrappolati e senza valore. Questa insicurezza sul futuro crea uno stress costante e la preoccupazione di ciò che accadrà dopo.

Le lotte per l’alloggio possono portare a incertezza, insicurezza, ansia, sentirsi a disagio o sentirsi depressi. Questi sentimenti possono anche peggiorare qualsiasi condizione di salute mentale pre-esistente. La maggior parte dei giovani senza una casa ha già a che fare con problemi di salute mentale, il che può rendere ancora più difficile per loro superare le difficoltà di alloggio.

Mi piacerebbe vedere una strategia UE per la salute mentale. Abbiamo bisogno di un approccio europeo alla salute mentale. In modo che non importa da dove tu venga in Europa, ma che i servizi di salute mentale siano accessibili a tutti noi. E, naturalmente, dobbiamo garantire l’accesso a case a prezzi accessibili per tutti.

DISOCCUPAZIONE: COME INFLUISCE SULLA SALUTE MENTALE DEI GIOVANI?

Marco Piana

Marco viene da Pavia, in Italia

Marco ha 26 anni. Ci ha raccontato come rimanere disoccupato lo abbia colpito mentalmente e come questo influisca sulla salute mentale dei giovani più in generale.

Marco, come ti sei sentito ad essere disoccupato durante la pandemia?

Avevo 24 anni quando mi sono trasferito da Copenhagen a Bruxelles, sperando di iniziare presto la mia vita lavorativa.

Dopo i primi giorni, ho capito che il livello di competizione per ottenere uno stage retribuito relativo ai miei interessi (relazioni internazionali e cooperazione) era eccessivamente alto. Il mercato del lavoro era completamente saturo. Quindi, come spesso nella mia vita ho cercato di trovare un lavoro in un bar, un ristorante o un negozio. Senza, non sarei stato in grado pagare le bollette. Purtroppo, nel giro di due settimane tutte queste attività hanno dovuto chiudere causa Covid.

Così, ho abbassato ulteriormente le mie aspettative, sperando semplicemente di trovare una qualsiasi fonte di reddito il più presto possibile. Ho iniziato a inviare un’infinita serie di domande di lavoro, le quali tornavano cronicamente a destinazione fresche di rifiuto. Iniziavano sempre con: “Nonostante il suo profilo sia altamente qualificato per la posizione, in questa occasione, abbiamo deciso di non portare avanti la sua candidatura“. O ancora: “Le scrivo per farle sapere che non è stato selezionato per il colloquio, ma siamo sicuri che troverà qualcos’altro in futuro, visto il suo brillante profilo!“. Apparentemente, però, il mio profilo da solo non bastava. Avevo bisogno di una previa esperienza lavorativa prima di poter ottenere la mia vera e propria esperienza lavorativa. Paradossale, non trovate?

Di fatto, ho passato mesi in una condizione precaria, sia mentalmente che finanziariamente. Le restrizioni per arginare gli effetti del Covid-19 e l’isolamento hanno ovviamente avuto un ulteriore impatto negativo sulla mia routine quotidiana. Dopo sei mesi, avevo quasi raggiunto un esaurimento. Alla fine, sono stato costretto a tornare a casa in Italia per alcuni mesi, il che mi ha fatto sentire peggio. Pensavo di aver perso la battaglia per ottenere un lavoro, dopo aver appena ottenuto due lauree magistrali.

In che modo la pandemia di Covid-19 e la disoccupazione hanno colpito i giovani?

Alla fine, ho comunque deciso di rinunciare ad un lavoro remunerato e iniziare uno stage non pagato. Ciò sia per continuare a incrementare il mio CV (cosa che è apparentemente successa), sia per convincermi che almeno stavo facendo qualcosa.

La realtà è che nonostante i vari lavori part-time che ho fatto durante gli studi, sono sempre stato dipendente da qualcuno. Mi considero una persona estremamente fortunata, perché la mia famiglia è sempre stata in grado di supportarmi economicamente e mentalmente. Ma più di una volta ho sentito che la mia stessa dignità mi stesse venendo tolta. Questa sensazione di inadeguatezza, mi ha fatto dubitare delle mie capacità, rimettere in discussione le scelte di studio che avevo fatto  e perdere la fiducia nel sistema occupazionale.

Avete avuto un’esperienza simile negli ultimi due anni? Non siete soli.
Secondo una ricerca di Eurostat, nel 2020 c’erano quasi 14 milioni di giovani adulti (tra i 20 e i 34 anni) che non erano né occupati né in formazione.

Un recente studio del Parlamento europeo ha mostrato che i giovani sono stati particolarmente colpiti dal Covid-19, in termine di occupazione e salute mentale, per i seguenti motivi:

  • la pandemia ha colpito più duramente il settore alberghiero e ristorativo, che impiega molti studenti, i quali potevano permettersi di perdere la loro unica fonte di reddito.
  • molti datori di lavoro sono riluttanti ad assumere i giovani a causa della mancanza di esperienza, ma non si può fare esperienza senza trovare un lavoro. Questo crea una situazione impossibile per i giovani che cercano di trovare lavoro subito dopo aver finito la loro istruzione. 
  • i giovani sono più propensi a firmare contratti temporanei, che sono stati i primi ad essere terminati durante la pandemia, e di conseguenza i più precari.

Un altro studio a livello europeo ha scoperto che il benessere mentale ha raggiunto il suo livello più basso in tutti i gruppi di età dall’inizio della pandemia, più di due anni fa. Non sorprende che i giovani abbiano sperimentato più solitudine, depressione e isolamento sociale di qualsiasi altro gruppo.

Cosa si sta facendo a livello europeo per affrontare la disoccupazione e la salute mentale dei giovani nell’UE?

Il 2022 è l’anno europeo della gioventù. L’obiettivo sarebbe mettere in luce l’importanza di dare voce alle sfie che noi giovani dobbiamo affrontare quotidianamente. Ad un livello più pratico, gli Stati membri dell’UE hanno presentato i loro piani di investimento per migliorare il livello di vita complessivo dei giovani nell’Unione europea, dopo la pandemia Covid-19.

Kim Van Sparrentak, una delle più giovani eurodeputate dei Verdi/ALE, ha affrontato la

questione lo scorso febbraio con un brillante discorso nel dibattito del Parlamento europeo, “Una gioventù, un’Europa”.

Inoltre, il gruppo dei Verdi/ALE da mesi lavora mano nella mano con la FYEG (l’organizzazione ombrello dei Giovani Verdi in Europa). Insieme, abbiamo organizzato una campagna per il divieto degli stage non pagati e una per garantire uno standard minimo di diritti per le condizioni di lavoro dei giovani.

Per me, questo sarebbe il primo passo concreto per colmare un vuoto che troppi giovani devono subire prima di poter guadagnare un reddito decente e dignitoso e per iniziare la loro transizione verso l’età adulta.

ANSIA DA CLIMA: COME INFLUISCE IL CAMBIAMENTO CLIMATICO SULLA SALUTE MENTALE DEI GIOVANI?

Tim Cullen

Timothy viene da Trier, in Germania

Timothy ha 26 anni ed è di doppia nazionalità scozzese e tedesca. Insieme abbiamo discusso di come il cambiamento climatico influisca sulla salute mentale dei giovani, alimentando le loro ansie e paure. 

 

Cos’è esattamente l’ansia da clima?

L’ansia climatica è una forma di angoscia psicologica per la minaccia posta dalla crisi climatica. È un fenomeno relativamente nuovo, ma i suoi effetti sono diffusi. Uno studio recente proveninete dalla Germania ha mostrato che il 55% dei giovani sono preoccupati dagli impatti del cambiamento climatico sul loro benessere.

Come giovani, tendiamo a sperimentare l’ansia climatica più intensamente poiché siamo la generazione che subisce (e subirà sempre più) le conseguenze di un pianeta che si riscalda. L’ansia climatica tra i giovani è spesso associata ad un senso di impotenza che nasce quando i governi fanno troppo poco per fermare il cambiamento climatico.

Oggi, abbiamo raggiunto un periodo in cui stiamo vedendo le conseguenze del cambiamento climatico dispiegarsi davanti ai nostri occhi. Tutti abbiamo assistito o siamo stati personalmente colpiti da disastri naturali come incendi boschivi, siccità e inondazioni. C’è un senso di inevitabilità riguardo al cambiamento climatico. Si sta facendo troppo poco, troppo tardi. L’ansia climatica nei giovani è aumentata, perché temono per il loro futuro e per quello del pianeta.

Questa ansia è anche giustificata dal recente rapporto dell’IPCC (Gruppo Intergovernativo di Scienziati sul Cambiamento Climatico), che ci dice che questi disastri climatici peggioreranno se i governi non iniziano ad agire ora. Inazione sul cambiamento climatico significa non dare priorità alla protezione della salute mentale dei giovani.

Timothy, puoi dirci cosa significa per te l’ansia da clima?

L’ansia climatica per me è un’esperienza profondamente personale. L’anno scorso ho assistito alla devastazione causata da gravi inondazioni vicino alla mia città natale, Trier, in Germania. Più di 200 persone in Europa hanno perso la vita a causa delle inondazioni.

Ricordo bene le emozioni di quell’estate. Mi sentivo triste e impotente guardando il telegiornale. Era lo stesso senso di impotenza che ho provato durante il picco della pandemia di Covid-19. Solo che questa volta, la catastrofe ha colpito ancor più “vicino” a casa.

La mia paura oggi è che questo tipo di eventi si ripetano ancora e ancora. Più che paura, è una triste realtà. Soprattutto perché l’ansia climatica non sembra qualcosa che i giovani dovrebbero affrontare da soli. Come giovane, non dovrei preoccuparmi dell’ignoranza e dell’inazione dei governi nella lotta contro il cambiamento climatico. Nella mia visione, l’ansia climatica è un peso inutile sulle spalle dei giovani.

Cosa possiamo fare per l’ansia climatica?

In primo luogo, abbiamo assolutamente bisogno di servizi di salute mentale più abbordabili e accessibili.

Se i governi vogliono davvero mostrare di prendere sul serio l’ansia climatica, allora dovrebbero fare tutto ciò che è in loro potere per migliorare l’assistenza alla salute mentale. Questo include anche più fondi per la ricerca sui problemi di salute mentale.

Per fortuna, ho visto che nonostante tutti gli ostacoli già menzionati, la nostra generazione è davvero resiliente. Infatti, dopo un’assenza di 2 anni, abbiamo visto gli attivisti del clima tornare nelle strade per il primo sciopero globale del clima dopo la pandemia.

Personalmente, ho scoperto che partecipare ad una manifestazione mi fa superare le molte emozioni negative che associo al cambiamento climatico. Mi sento rafforzato e trovo un senso di appartenenza, poiché vedo che la mia generazione è unita in questa lotta collettiva. Ciò mi aiuta davvero a tranquillizzarmi un po’.

In definitiva, però, l’unico modo per eliminare l’ansia climatica come una delle radici dei problemi di salute mentale è quello di mitigare il cambiamento climatico. Abbiamo bisogno di un’azione chiara sul clima e ne abbiamo bisogno ora. (Leggete come i Verdi/EFA hanno spinto per l’azione climatica nell’UE).

In ogni caso, dobbiamo continuare a fare pressione. Per ora, il nostro strumento più potente per chiedere conto a chi prende le decisioni è portare la lotta per la giustizia climatica nelle strade. Dobbiamo esigere che i politici agiscano ora – non solo per il bene della nostra salute mentale, ma per un futuro degno del nostro meraviglioso pianeta.

QUINDI, DOVE ANDIAMO DA QUI?

È inutile nascondersi, la maggior parte di noi avrà un problema di salute mentale ad un certo punto della propria vita. Ogni giovane che ha bisogno di servizi di terapia merita l’accesso a opzioni di terapia appropriate, indipendentemente dalla sua situazione finanziaria.

Quindi, abbiamo bisogno di una strategia europea per la salute mentale. Abbiamo bisogno di servizi di salute mentale che siano abbordabili e accessibili a tutti, soprattutto per i più poveri, per i migranti e per i più vulnerabili.

Per risolvere la crisi della salute mentale dei giovani, abbiamo bisogno di:

• Un diritto ai servizi di salute mentale in tutta l’UE

• Finanziamenti per la cura e la ricerca sulla salute mentale

• Indennità di alloggio per i giovani

• Un reddito minimo in tutta l’UE

Ci rendiamo conto che non ci sono soluzioni rapide a grandi problemi come la disoccupazione, il costo degli alloggi e la crisi climatica. Eppure, le nostre storie mostrano che i problemi di salute mentale dei giovani dovrebbero essere presi sul serio. 

Siamo stanchi della pandemia del Covid-19. Siamo stanchi della pandemia relativa alla salute mentale dei giovani.

Chiaramente, ora siamo a un bivio. I governi dell’UE o continuano a ignorare le cause profonde della salute mentale, o iniziano ad agire. Speriamo che le nostre storie abbiano dato loro qualche spunto di riflessione.

Ora vogliamo sentire le vostre opinioni!

Che esperienza avete avuto a livello di salute mentale durante la pandemia? Soffrite di ansia da clima? Cosa pensate della guerra in Ucraina?

Non vediamo l’ora di leggere le vostre storie sotto questo post su Instagram.
Saremo prontissimi a respondervi – ci vediamo lì!

LA SALUD MENTAL ES RIQUEZA, ¿POR QUÉ LA JUVENTUD EUROPEA NO TIENE NINGUNA DE LAS DOS?

El mundo está en llamas. Una pandemia mundial hace estragos. La economía va a cámara lenta. No hay trabajo. Los jóvenes no pueden permitirse independizarse de sus padres o vivir por su cuenta. Leer las noticias es deprimente. No es de extrañar que los problemas de salud mental entre los jóvenes (de 15 a 24 años) se hayan duplicado en sólo un año. Tres de nuestros becarios de Los Verdes/ALE –Marco, Carolina y Timothy, jóvenes de toda la UE- nos cuentan cómo les han afectado el desempleo, la crisis de la vivienda y el cambio climático, y el impacto que ha tenido en su propia salud mental.

Junto a la COVID-19, otra pandemia invisible ha arrasado el mundo desde principios de 2020. Se trata de la crisis sobre la salud mental de los jóvenes. Los jóvenes tienen entre un 30% y un 80% más de probabilidades de sufrir depresión o ansiedad desde que comenzó la pandemia, según un informe de la OCDE.

Las causas de los problemas de salud mental entre los jóvenes son muchas. Y, por supuesto, cada joven tiene sus propias cargas personales. Sin embargo, está claro que nuestra generación se enfrenta a algunos enormes problemas comunes. Nos centraremos en tres temas que afrontan los jóvenes en Europa -la crisis climática, el desempleo y la vivienda- y nos preguntaremos: ¿cómo es enfrentarse a estos problemas como joven en la UE? ¿Y cómo podemos proteger nuestra salud mental?

Mientras lees, ¿por qué no escuchas nuestra lista de reproducción sobre salud mental? Siéntete libre y baila un poco con nosotros sobre estos problemas compartidos

LUCHA POR LA VIVIENDA: ¿CÓMO AFECTA A LA SALUD MENTAL DE LOS JÓVENES?

Carolina photo

Carolina de Madrid, España

Carolina tiene 23 años. Hemos charlado con ella y nos ha contado cómo afecta la lucha por la vivienda a su generación y cómo cree que afecta a la salud mental de los jóvenes.

¿Cómo afecta la crisis de la vivienda en Europa a los jóvenes?

Encontrar una casa es mucho más difícil ahora que en el pasado, sobre todo para los jóvenes. Mientras que nuestros padres o abuelos probablemente ya tenían un trabajo y una casa a nuestra edad, nosotros apenas conseguimos pagar el alquiler cada mes.

He tenido la suerte de vivir en cuatro países: España, Francia, Bélgica y Reino Unido. En todos ellos, he visto cómo mis amigos sufrían el estrés y la incertidumbre de no saber dónde vivirían al mes siguiente. Si encontrarían algo a un precio asequible o si tendrían que recoger sus cosas y volver a casa.

Los altos precios y la rapidez con la que cambia el mercado de la vivienda hacen que sea una verdadera lucha encontrar un lugar barato para vivir. A menudo hay tantos requisitos antes de poder firmar un contrato: tener un contrato de trabajo, encontrar un garante, ahorrar para un depósito… Es una barrera que muchos jóvenes simplemente no podrán cruzar. En Lyon, viví en un alojamiento privado para estudiantes. Aun así, me pidieron el sueldo de mis padres de los dos últimos años y dos avalistas, a pesar de ser una estudiante con una beca Erasmus.

En España, también he visto las diferentes realidades de vivir en grandes ciudades como Barcelona y Madrid. El alquiler medio mensual en estas dos ciudades es un 82% más caro que en el resto del país. Mis amigos que vienen a Madrid desde otras ciudades apenas consiguen encontrar una habitación a un precio asequible, y además tienen que pagar por su educación.

De media, los jóvenes representan entre el 20 y el 30% del total de personas sin hogar en la mayoría de los países europeos. Estas cifras han aumentado en los últimos años y la situación no ha hecho más que empeorar durante la pandemia.

Incluso los más afortunados, que pueden permitirse pagar un alquiler, tienen que destinar más del 50% de su salario a la vivienda. Lo que hace difícil poder llegar a fin de mes. Las prácticas no remuneradas o los bajos salarios sumados al alto coste del alquiler en la mayoría de los países europeos lo convierten en un círculo vicioso.

Los jóvenes estamos atrapados: somos incapaces de firmar un contrato de alquiler por nosotros mismos, incapaces de pagar un alquiler e incapaces de ahorrar para nuestra propia casa.

¿Y si compartimos piso? ¿Es éste el futuro de la vivienda para los jóvenes?

Compartir un piso con otras cinco personas se ha convertido en lo normal para las personas de entre 20 y 30 años. En ciudades como Madrid, Barcelona, París, Ámsterdam o Bruselas, el alquiler medio mensual de un piso ronda los 1000 euros, mientras que el salario medio de los jóvenes en España o Italia es de 1200 euros. No es difícil hacer las cuentas. La única forma de independizarse es compartir piso.

A menudo se habla de compartir piso como una “experiencia enriquecedora” o “vivir en un entorno multicultural”. Y a menudo se le llama co-living. Esta expresión trata de idealizar la situación tan precaria en la que se encuentran tantos jóvenes en toda Europa. Vivir con extraños no es una preferencia personal guay: es nuestra única opción.

¿Qué tiene que ver la crisis de la vivienda con la salud mental?

El coste del alquiler, la angustia de no encontrar un sitio donde vivir o tener que depender del apoyo económico de tus padres son temores compartidos por muchos jóvenes en toda Europa.

La incertidumbre hace que a los jóvenes les resulte casi imposible pensar en tener hijos o comprar una casa sin tener un trabajo estable. Hace que cambien nuestras principales opciones de vida. Puede hacernos sentir atrapados e inútiles. Esta inseguridad sobre el futuro crea un estrés y una preocupación constante sobre lo que pasará después.

Los problemas de vivienda pueden provocar incertidumbre, inseguridad, ansiedad, sensación de incomodidad o depresión. Estos sentimientos también pueden empeorar cualquier condición de salud mental anterior. La mayoría de los jóvenes sin hogar ya tienen problemas de salud mental, lo que hace aún más difícil superar estos obstáculos.

Me gustaría ver una estrategia de salud mental de la UE. Necesitamos un enfoque europeo de la salud mental. Para que, sea cual sea el lugar de Europa en el que te encuentres, los servicios de salud mental sean asequibles y accesibles para todos nosotros. Y, por supuesto, tenemos que garantizar el acceso a viviendas asequibles para todos.

DESEMPLEO: ¿CÓMO AFECTA A LA SALUD MENTAL DE LOS JÓVENES?

Marco Piana

Marco, de Milán, Italia

Marco tiene 26 años. Nos ha contado cómo le ha afectado mentalmente estar en paro y cómo afecta a la salud mental de los jóvenes en general.

Marco, ¿qué sentiste al estar desempleado durante la pandemia?

Tenía 24 años cuando me trasladé de Copenhague a Bruselas, con la esperanza de empezar pronto mi vida laboral.

Tras los primeros días, comprendí que había mucha competencia para conseguir unas prácticas remuneradas relacionadas con mis intereses (Relaciones Internacionales y Cooperación). El mercado laboral estaba saturado. Intenté encontrar un trabajo en un bar, un restaurante o una tienda para poder pagar mis facturas. Pero, por desgracia, en dos semanas todo había cerrado.

Así que rebajé mis expectativas y simplemente esperé encontrar cualquier fuente de ingresos lo antes posible. Continué con cientos de solicitudes y posteriores rechazos. Siempre empezaban diciendo: “A pesar de que su perfil es altamente cualificado para el puesto, en esta ocasión hemos decidido no seguir con su solicitud”. O también: “Le escribo para comunicarle que no ha sido seleccionado para una entrevista, pero estamos seguros de que encontrará algo más en el futuro, teniendo en cuenta su brillante perfil”. Pero mi perfil no era suficiente. Necesitaba experiencia laboral antes de conseguir experiencia laboral.

Me pasé meses en una situación precaria, tanto mental como económicamente. Las restricciones de COVID y el confinamiento tuvieron un impacto negativo aún mayor en mi día a día. Al cabo de seis meses, casi había llegado al límite. Finalmente, me vi obligado a volver a casa, a Italia, durante unos meses, lo que me hizo sentir aún peor. Pensé que había perdido la batalla para conseguir un trabajo.

¿Cómo ha afectado la pandemia del COVID-19 y el desempleo a los jóvenes?

Al final, decidí renunciar a un trabajo remunerado y decidí empezar unas prácticas no remuneradas para seguir impulsando mi CV (cosa que conseguí) y por lo menos así sentir que estaba haciendo algo.

Tengo la suerte de que mi familia pudo apoyarme de una u otra manera. Pero, a pesar de los diversos trabajos a tiempo parcial que tuve, siempre he dependido de alguien. Más de una vez sentí que me quitaban mi propia dignidad. Ese sentimiento de incapacidad me hizo dudar de mis habilidades, dudar de las decisiones que había tomado y de perder la confianza en el sistema laboral.

¿Has tenido una experiencia similar en los últimos dos años? No estás solo.
Según un estudio de Eurostat, en 2020 había casi 14 millones de adultos jóvenes (de 20 a 34 años) que no tenían empleo y tampoco estaban en proceso de educación y formación.

Un estudio reciente del Parlamento Europeo mostró que los jóvenes se vieron especialmente afectados por la crisis del COVID-19 en términos de empleo y salud mental, por las siguientes razones:

  • la pandemia afectó más al sector de la hostelería, que emplea a muchos estudiantes que no podían permitirse perder su única fuente de ingresos
  • muchos empresarios son reacios a contratar a jóvenes por falta de experiencia, pero no se puede adquirir experiencia sin conseguir un trabajo. Esto crea una situación imposible para los jóvenes que intentan encontrar trabajo al terminar sus estudios.
  • Los jóvenes son más propensos a firmar contratos temporales, ya que fueron los primeros en terminarse durante la pandemia de COVID-19, y por tanto los más precarios.

Otro estudio a escala europea reveló que el bienestar mental ha alcanzado su nivel más bajo en todos los grupos de edad desde el comienzo de la pandemia, hace más de dos años. Los jóvenes han experimentado más soledad, depresión y aislamiento social que cualquier otro grupo de edad.

¿Qué se está haciendo para combatir el desempleo y la salud mental de los jóvenes en la UE?

2022 es el Año Europeo de la Juventud, cuyo objetivo es poner de manifiesto la importancia de dar voz a los retos que tiene que afrontar nuestra juventud. Los Estados miembros de la UE han presentado sus planes para mejorar el nivel de vida general de los jóvenes en la Unión Europea, tras la pandemia del COVID-19.Kim Van Sparrentak, una de los eurodiputadas más jóvenes del Grupo de los Verdes/ALE, abordó esta cuestión el pasado mes de febrero con un brillante discurso en el debate del Parlamento Europeo, “Una juventud, una Europa”.

El Grupo de los Verdes/ALE trabaja codo con codo con FYEG (la organización que agrupa a los Jóvenes Verdes en Europa). Juntos, estamos haciendo campaña por la prohibición de las prácticas no remuneradas y por un estándar mínimo de derechos para las condiciones de trabajo de los jóvenes.

Para mí, este sería el primer paso práctico para llenar un vacío que demasiados jóvenes tienen que sufrir antes de poder obtener unos ingresos decentes y dignos y comenzar la transición a la edad adulta.

ANSIEDAD CLIMÁTICA: ¿CÓMO AFECTA EL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO A LA SALUD MENTAL DE LOS JÓVENES?

Tim Cullen

Timothy, de Tréveris, Alemania

Timothy tiene 26 años y tiene nacionalidad escocesa y alemana. Juntos hablamos de cómo el cambio climático afecta a la salud mental de los jóvenes y aumenta su ansiedad.

¿Qué es exactamente la ansiedad climática?

La ansiedad climática es una forma de malestar psicológico por la amenaza que supone la crisis climática. Es un fenómeno relativamente nuevo, pero sus efectos están muy extendidos. Un estudio reciente realizado en Alemania mostró que el 55% de los jóvenes estaban preocupados por el impacto del cambio climático en su bienestar.

Como jóvenes, tendemos a experimentar la ansiedad climática con mayor intensidad, ya que somos la generación que soportará las consecuencias de un planeta que se calienta. La ansiedad climática entre los jóvenes se atribuye a menudo a un sentimiento de impotencia que surge cuando los gobiernos hacen muy poco por detener el cambio climático.

Ahora hemos llegado a un periodo en el que estamos viendo las consecuencias del cambio climático desplegarse ante nuestros ojos. Todos hemos sido testigos o incluso nos hemos visto personalmente afectados por catástrofes naturales como incendios forestales, sequías e inundaciones. El cambio climático tiene una sensación de inevitabilidad. Se está haciendo demasiado poco y demasiado tarde. La ansiedad por el clima se ha disparado entre los jóvenes, que temen por su propio futuro y el del planeta.

Esta ansiedad también se ve alimentada por el reciente informe del IPCC (Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático), que nos dice que estos desastres climáticos empeorarán si los gobiernos no empiezan a actuar ahora. La inacción ante el cambio climático significa inacción en la protección de la salud mental de los jóvenes.

Timothy, ¿puedes decirnos qué significa para ti la ansiedad climática?

La ansiedad climática es para mí una experiencia profundamente personal. El año pasado fui testigo de la devastación causada por graves inundaciones cerca de mi ciudad natal, Tréveris, en el oeste de Alemania. Más de 200 personas perdieron la vida en Europa a causa de las inundaciones.

Recuerdo bien las emociones de aquel verano. Me sentí triste e impotente al ver las noticias. Era la misma sensación de impotencia que experimenté durante el pico de la pandemia del COVID-19. Sólo que esta vez, la catástrofe fue muy cerca de casa.

Mi temor hoy es que este tipo de acontecimientos se repitan una y otra vez. Es una triste realidad. Especialmente, porque la ansiedad por el clima no parece algo con lo que los jóvenes deban lidiar. Como joven, no debería tener que preocuparme por la ignorancia y la inacción de los gobiernos en la lucha contra el cambio climático. La ansiedad climática es una carga innecesaria sobre las espaldas de los jóvenes.

¿Qué podemos hacer contra la ansiedad climática?

En primer lugar, necesitamos más servicios de salud mental asequibles y accesibles.

Si los gobiernos quieren demostrar que se toman en serio la ansiedad climática, deberían hacer todo lo que esté en su mano para mejorar la atención a la salud mental. Esto también incluye una mayor financiación para la investigación de los problemas de salud mental.

Afortunadamente, he visto que a pesar de todos los obstáculos, nuestra generación es resistente. Tras dos años de ausencia, hemos visto cómo los activistas del clima volvían a las calles para la primera huelga climática mundial desde la pandemia.

Lo que he descubierto es que asistir a una manifestación me hace superar las muchas emociones negativas que asocio con el cambio climático. Me siento empoderado y encuentro un sentido de pertenencia, ya que veo que mi generación está luchando juntos. Me ayuda a tranquilizarme un poco.

En última instancia, sin embargo, la única manera de eliminar la ansiedad climática como una de las raíces de los problemas de salud mental es mitigar el cambio climático. Necesitamos una acción climática clara y la necesitamos ahora. (Lee cómo los Verdes/ALE han estado presionando para que se tomen medidas climáticas en la UE).

Debemos mantener la presión. Por ahora, nuestra herramienta más poderosa para hacer que los responsables de la toma de decisiones rindan cuentas es llevar la lucha por la justicia climática a las calles. Debemos exigir a los políticos que actúen ahora, no sólo por nuestra salud mental, sino por un futuro digno en nuestro hermoso planeta.

¿A DÓNDE VAMOS A PARTIR DE AQUÍ?

La mayoría de nosotros tendrá un problema de salud mental en algún momento de su vida. Todos los jóvenes que necesitan servicios de terapia merecen tener acceso a opciones terapéuticas adecuadas, independientemente de su situación económica.

Necesitamos una estrategia de salud mental en la UE. Necesitamos servicios de salud mental asequibles y accesibles para todos. Y especialmente para los más pobres, para los inmigrantes y para los más vulnerables.

Para solucionar la crisis de salud mental de los jóvenes, necesitamos

Somos conscientes de que no hay una rápida solución para estos problemas tan grandes como son el desempleo, la vivienda y la crisis climática. Sin embargo, nuestras historias demuestran que los problemas de salud mental de los jóvenes deben tomarse en serio. Estamos cansados de la pandemia del COVID-19. Estamos cansados de la pandemia de la salud mental.

Está claro que nos encontramos en una encrucijada. Los gobiernos de la UE o siguen ignorando las causas fundamentales de la salud mental o empiezan a actuar. Esperamos que nuestras historias os hayan hecho reflexionar.

¡Ahora queremos conocer tu opinión!


¿Cuál ha sido tu experiencia con la salud mental durante la pandemia? ¿Tienes ansiedad climática? ¿Qué opinas de la guerra en Ucrania?

Estamos deseando que nos lo cuentes en este post de Instagram. Estaremos en los comentarios respondiéndote. ¡Nos vemos allí!

Psychische Gesundheit bedeutet Wohlstand – warum hat Europas Jugend dann weder das eine noch das andere?

Die Welt steht in Flammen. Eine globale Pandemie wütet. Die Wirtschaft läuft auf Sparflamme. Es gibt keine Jobs. Junge Menschen können es sich nicht leisten, aus dem Haus ihrer Eltern auszuziehen oder allein zu leben. Nachrichten zu lesen ist deprimierend. Es ist kein Wunder, dass sich die mentalen Probleme junger Menschen (15- bis 24-Jährige) in nur einem Jahr verdoppelt haben. Drei unserer Grünen/EFA-Praktikant*innen – Marco, Carolina und Timothy, junge Menschen aus der ganzen EU – erzählen uns, wie sie von Arbeitslosigkeit, der Wohnungskrise und dem Klimawandel betroffen sind und welche Auswirkungen das auf ihre eigene psychische Gesundheit hat.

Neben COVID-19 gibt es seit Anfang 2020 eine weitere, unsichtbare Pandemie, die den Globus erfasst hat. Die Rede ist von der Krise der mentalen Gesundheit von jungen Menschen. Einem Bericht der OECD (Organisation für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung) zufolge ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass junge Menschen an Depressionen oder Angstzuständen leiden, seit Beginn der Pandemie um 30 bis 80 % gestiegen.

Die Ursachen für psychische Probleme bei jungen Menschen sind vielfältig. Und natürlich hat jeder junge Mensch seine eigenen persönlichen Belastungen. Es ist jedoch klar, dass unsere Generation mit einigen großen gemeinsamen Problemen zu kämpfen hat. Wir werfen einen genaueren Blick auf drei Themen, mit denen junge Menschen in Europa konfrontiert sind – die Klimakrise, Arbeitslosigkeit und Wohnungsnot – und fragen: Wie sieht es aus, wenn man als junger Mensch in der EU mit diesen Problemen konfrontiert ist? Und wie können wir unsere psychische Gesundheit schützen?


Während du liest, kannst du dir unsere Playlist zur mentalen Gesundheit anhören. Du kannst auch gerne ein bisschen mit uns über unsere gemeinsamen Probleme tanzen!

WOHNUNGSNOT: WIE WIRKT SIE SICH AUF DIE PSYCHISCHE GESUNDHEIT VON JUNGEN MENSCHEN AUS?

Carolina photo

Carolina aus Madrid, Spanien

Carolina ist 23 Jahre alt. Sie hat uns erzählt, wie sich die Wohnungsnot auf unsere Generation auswirkt und wie sie glaubt, dass sie die psychische Gesundheit von jungen Menschen beeinträchtigt.

Wie wirkt sich die Wohnungskrise in Europa auf junge Menschen aus?

Eine Wohnung zu finden ist viel schwieriger als früher – vor allem für junge Menschen. Während unsere Eltern oder Großeltern in unserem Alter wahrscheinlich schon einen Job und ein Haus hatten, schaffen wir es kaum, jeden Monat die Miete zu bezahlen.

Ich habe das Glück, bereits in vier Ländern gelebt zu haben: Spanien, Frankreich, Belgien und dem Vereinigten Königreich. In allen Ländern habe ich gesehen, wie meine Freunde unter dem Stress und der Ungewissheit litten, nicht zu wissen, wo sie im nächsten Monat wohnen würden. Ob sie etwas zu einem erschwinglichen Preis finden würden oder ob sie ihre Sachen abholen und wieder nach Hause fahren müssten. 

Hohe Preise und ein sich schnell verändernder Wohnungsmarkt machen es zu einem echten Kampf, eine günstige Wohnung zu finden. Oft gibt es so viele Anforderungen, bevor du einen Vertrag unterschreiben kannst: einen Arbeitsvertrag vorweisen, einen Bürgen finden, für eine Kaution sparen. Das ist eine Hürde, die viele junge Leute einfach nicht überwinden können. In Lyon habe ich in einer privaten Unterkunft für Studenten gewohnt. Trotzdem verlangten sie von mir einen Gehaltsnachweis meiner Eltern für die letzten zwei Jahre und zwei Bürgen, obwohl ich Studentin mit einem Erasmus-Stipendium war.

Warum gestaltet sich die Wohnungssuche in europäischen Städten so schwierig?

In Spanien habe ich auch gesehen, wie unterschiedlich die Lebensbedingungen in Großstädten wie Barcelona und Madrid sind. Die durchschnittliche Monatsmiete in diesen beiden Städten ist 82 % teurer als im Rest des Landes. Meine Freunde, die aus anderen Städten nach Madrid kommen, haben es kaum geschafft, ein Zimmer zu einem erschwinglichen Preis zu finden, während sie auch noch für ihre Ausbildung bezahlen müssen.

In den meisten europäischen Ländern machen junge Menschen im Durchschnitt 20-30 % der Gesamtzahl der Obdachlosen aus. Diese Zahlen sind in den letzten Jahren gestiegen und die Situation hat sich während der Pandemie noch verschlimmert.

Selbst die Glücklichen, die es sich leisten können, Miete zu zahlen, müssen mehr als 50 % ihres Lohns für die Unterkunft aufwenden. Das macht es schwierig, über die Runden zu kommen. Unbezahlte Praktika oder niedrige Löhne zusammen mit den hohen Mietkosten in den meisten europäischen Ländern machen es zu einem Teufelskreis. 

Junge Menschen sitzen in der Falle: Wir sind nicht in der Lage, selbst einen Mietvertrag zu unterschreiben, können uns die Miete nicht leisten und sind nicht in der Lage, für eine eigene Wohnung zu sparen.

Wie wäre es mit einer Wohngemeinschaft? Ist das die Zukunft des Wohnens für junge Menschen?

Eine Wohnung mit fünf anderen Menschen zu teilen ist für Menschen mit Mitte 20 oder 30 normal geworden. In Städten wie Madrid, Barcelona, Paris, Amsterdam oder Brüssel liegt die durchschnittliche Monatsmiete für eine Wohnung bei 1000 €, während der Durchschnittslohn für junge Menschen in Spanien oder Italien bei 1200 € liegt. Es ist klar – diese Rechnung geht nicht auf. Die einzige Möglichkeit, unabhängig zu werden, ist eine Wohngemeinschaft.

Das Teilen einer Wohnung wird oft als „bereichernde Erfahrung” oder „Leben in einem multikulturellen Umfeld” bezeichnet. Und oft wird es auch als Zusammenwohnen bezeichnet. Mit dieser Formulierung wird versucht, die sehr prekäre Situation, in der sich so viele junge Menschen in ganz Europa befinden, zu romantisieren. Das Zusammenleben mit Fremden ist keine coole persönliche Vorliebe – es ist unsere einzige Option.

Was hat die Wohnungskrise mit mentaler Gesundheit zu tun?

Die Kosten für die Miete, die Angst, keine Wohnung zu finden oder auf die finanzielle Unterstützung der Eltern angewiesen zu sein, sind Ängste, die viele junge Menschen in ganz Europa teilen. 

Die Ungewissheit macht es für junge Menschen fast unmöglich, ohne einen festen Job überhaupt daran zu denken, Kinder zu bekommen oder ein Haus zu kaufen. Sie verändert unsere wichtigsten Lebensentscheidungen. Sie kann dazu führen, dass wir uns gefangen und wertlos fühlen. Diese Unsicherheit über die Zukunft erzeugt ständigen Stress und die Sorge, was als Nächstes passieren wird. 

Wohnungsnot kann zu Ungewissheit, Unsicherheit, Ängsten, Unbehagen oder Depressionen führen. Diese Gefühle können auch bestehende psychische Erkrankungen verschlimmern. Die meisten obdachlosen jungen Menschen haben bereits mit mentalen Problemen zu kämpfen, was es für sie noch schwieriger machen kann, die Hürden der Wohnungssuche zu überwinden.

Ich würde mir eine EU-Strategie für psychische Gesundheit wünschen. Wir brauchen einen europaweiten Ansatz für die psychische Gesundheit. Egal, wo in Europa du herkommst, mentale Gesundheitsdienste sind für uns alle erschwinglich und zugänglich. Und natürlich müssen wir den Zugang zu bezahlbaren Wohnungen für alle sicherstellen.

ARBEITSLOSIGKEIT: WIE WIRKT SIE SICH AUF DIE PSYCHISCHE GESUNDHEIT VON JUNGEN MENSCHEN AUS?

Marco Piana

Marco aus Mailand, Italien

Marco ist 26 Jahre alt. Er hat uns erzählt, wie sich die Arbeitslosigkeit auf seine Psyche ausgewirkt hat und wie sie sich auf die mentale Gesundheit von jungen Menschen im Allgemeinen auswirkt. 

Marco, wie hat es sich angefühlt, während der Pandemie arbeitslos zu sein?

Ich war 24 Jahre alt, als ich von Kopenhagen nach Brüssel zog, in der Hoffnung, bald ins Arbeitsleben einsteigen zu können. 

Nach den ersten Tagen wurde mir klar, dass die Konkurrenz um einen bezahlten Praktikumsplatz in meinem Interessengebiet (Internationale Beziehungen und Zusammenarbeit) sehr groß war. Der Stellenmarkt war gesättigt. Ich versuchte, einen Job in einer Bar, einem Restaurant oder einem Laden zu finden, um meine Rechnungen bezahlen zu können. Aber leider machte alles innerhalb von zwei Wochen dicht. 

Also schraubte ich meine Erwartungen herunter und hoffte einfach, so schnell wie möglich irgendeine Einnahmequelle zu finden. Ich durchlief eine scheinbar unendliche Reihe von Bewerbungsprozessen und bekam nur Ablehnungen zurück. Sie begannen immer mit: „Obwohl Ihr Profil sehr gut zu dieser Stelle passt, haben wir uns in diesem Fall entschieden, Ihre Bewerbung nicht weiter zu bearbeiten”. Oder: „Ich schreibe Ihnen, um Ihnen mitzuteilen, dass Sie nicht für ein Vorstellungsgespräch ausgewählt wurden, aber wir sind uns sicher, dass Sie aufgrund Ihres hervorragenden Profils in Zukunft etwas anderes finden werden!”. Aber mein Profil allein reichte nicht aus. Ich brauchte Arbeitserfahrung, bevor ich ein Praktikum bekommen konnte.

Ich verbrachte Monate in einer prekären Situation, sowohl mental als auch finanziell. Die COVID-Beschränkungen und der Lockdown hatten weitere negative Auswirkungen auf meinen Tagesablauf. Nach sechs Monaten hatte ich fast ein Burnout erreicht. Schließlich war ich gezwungen, für ein paar Monate zurück nach Italien zu gehen, was meine Lage noch verschlimmerte. Ich dachte, ich hätte den Kampf um einen Job verloren.

Wie haben sich die COVID-19-Pandemie und die Arbeitslosigkeit auf junge Menschen ausgewirkt?

Am Ende entschied ich mich, einen bezahlten Job aufzugeben und ein unbezahltes Praktikum zu machen, um meinen Lebenslauf aufzubessern (was auch gelang) und um wenigstens das Gefühl zu haben, etwas zu tun.

Ich hatte das Glück, dass meine Familie mich auf die eine oder andere Weise unterstützen konnte. Aber trotz der verschiedenen Teilzeitjobs, die ich nebenher hatte, war ich immer auf jemanden angewiesen. Mehr als einmal hatte ich das Gefühl, dass mir meine Würde geraubt wurde. Dieses Gefühl der Unzulänglichkeit ließ mich an meinen Fähigkeiten zweifeln, meine Entscheidungen in Frage zu stellen und das Vertrauen in das Beschäftigungssystem verlieren. 

Hast du in den letzten zwei Jahren eine ähnliche Erfahrung gemacht? Du bist nicht allein. 
Einer Studie von Eurostat zufolge gab es im Jahr 2020 fast 14 Millionen junge Erwachsene (im Alter von 20 bis 34 Jahren), die weder erwerbstätig waren noch eine Ausbildung absolvierten.

Neueste Erkenntnisse zu Arbeitslosigkeit und mentaler Gesundheit junger Menschen

Eine aktuelle Studie des Europäischen Parlaments hat gezeigt, dass junge Menschen in Bezug auf Beschäftigung und psychische Gesundheit besonders stark von der COVID-19-Krise betroffen sind.

Das hat die Studie zu Jugend, Arbeitslosigkeit und mentaler Gesundheit herausgefunden:

  • Die Pandemie hat das Gastgewerbe am stärksten getroffen, in dem viele Studierende beschäftigt sind, die es sich nicht leisten können, ihre einzige Einkommensquelle zu verlieren.
  • Viele Arbeitgeber*innen zögern, junge Menschen einzustellen, weil ihnen die Erfahrung fehlt, aber wir können keine Erfahrung sammeln, ohne einen Job zu bekommen. Das schafft eine unmögliche Situation für junge Menschen, die versuchen, nach ihrer Ausbildung Arbeit zu finden.
  • Junge Menschen unterschreiben häufiger befristete Verträge, die während der COVID-19-Pandemie als erste gekündigt wurden und somit am prekärsten sind.

Eine andere europaweite Studie ergab, dass das mentale Wohlbefinden in allen Altersgruppen den niedrigsten Stand seit Beginn der Pandemie vor über zwei Jahren erreicht hat. Junge Menschen haben mehr Einsamkeit, Depressionen und soziale Isolation erlebt als jede andere Altersgruppe.

Was wird getan, um Arbeitslosigkeit und psychische Gesundheit junger Menschen in der EU zu bekämpfen?

2022 ist das Europäische Jahr der Jugend, das die Bedeutung der europäischen Jugend ins Rampenlicht rücken soll. Die EU-Mitgliedstaaten haben ihre Investitionspläne vorgelegt, um den allgemeinen Lebensstandard junger Menschen in der Europäischen Union nach der COVID-19-Pandemie zu verbessern.

Kim Van Sparrentak, eine der jüngsten Europaabgeordneten der Grünen/EFA, hat das Thema im vergangenen Februar mit einer brillanten Rede in der Debatte des Europäischen Parlaments „Eine Jugend, ein Europa” angesprochen.

Die Grünen/EFA-Fraktion arbeitet Hand in Hand mit der FYEG (Vereinigung Junger Europäischer Grüner). Gemeinsam setzen wir uns für ein Verbot von unbezahlten Praktika und für einen Mindeststandard an Rechten für die Arbeitsbedingungen junger Menschen ein.

Für mich wäre das der erste praktische Schritt, um eine Lücke zu schließen, die zu viele junge Menschen durchlaufen müssen, bevor sie ein anständiges, menschenwürdiges Einkommen erzielen und ihren Übergang ins Erwachsenenleben beginnen können.

KLIMAANGST: WIE WIRKT SICH DER KLIMAWANDEL AUF DIE MENTALE GESUNDHEIT VON JUNGEN MENSCHEN AUS?

Tim Cullen

Timothy aus Trier, Deutschland

Timothy ist 26 Jahre alt und hat die schottische und deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit. Gemeinsam haben wir darüber gesprochen, wie sich der Klimawandel auf die psychische Gesundheit junger Menschen auswirkt und ihre Ängste schürt.

Was genau ist Klimaangst?

Klimaangst ist eine Form der psychischen Belastung durch die Bedrohung, die von der Klimakrise ausgeht. Sie ist ein relativ neues Phänomen, aber ihre Auswirkungen sind weit verbreitet. Eine aktuelle Studie aus Deutschland hat gezeigt, dass 55 % der jungen Menschen über die Auswirkungen des Klimawandels auf ihr Wohlbefinden besorgt sind.

Als junge Menschen neigen wir dazu, die Klimaangst intensiver zu erleben, da wir die Generation sind, die die Folgen der Erderwärmung tragen wird. Die Klimaangst von jungen Menschen wird oft auf ein Gefühl der Machtlosigkeit zurückgeführt, das entsteht, wenn Regierungen zu wenig tun, um den Klimawandel aufzuhalten.

Wir haben jetzt eine Phase erreicht, in der wir die Folgen des Klimawandels direkt vor unseren Augen sehen. Viele von uns haben Naturkatastrophen wie Waldbrände, Dürren und Überschwemmungen miterlebt oder waren sogar selbst davon betroffen. Wir haben das Gefühl, dass der Klimawandel unausweichlich ist. Es wird zu wenig und zu spät getan. Bei jungen Menschen hat die Angst vor dem Klimawandel stark zugenommen, weil sie um ihre eigene Zukunft und die des Planeten fürchten.

Diese Angst wird auch durch den jüngsten IPCC-Bericht (Weltklimarat) geschürt, der uns verdeutlicht, dass die Klimakatastrophen noch schlimmer werden, wenn die Regierungen nicht sofort handeln. Tatenlosigkeit beim Klimawandel bedeutet Tatenlosigkeit beim Schutz der psychischen Gesundheit von jungen Menschen.

Timothy, kannst du uns sagen, was Klimaangst für dich bedeutet?

Klimaangst ist für mich eine sehr persönliche Erfahrung. Letztes Jahr wurde ich Zeuge der verheerenden Überschwemmungen in der Nähe meiner Heimatstadt Trier, Rheinland-Pfalz. Mehr als 200 Menschen in Europa verloren ihr Leben durch die Fluten.

Ich erinnere mich noch gut an die Erlebnisse in diesem Sommer. Ich fühlte mich traurig und machtlos, als ich die Nachrichten sah. Es war dasselbe Gefühl der Hilflosigkeit, das ich während des Höhepunkts der COVID-19-Pandemie erlebte. Nur dass die Katastrophe dieses Mal so nah an meinem Zuhause war.

Heute befürchte ich, dass sich solche Ereignisse immer wiederholen werden. Das ist eine traurige Realität. Vor allem, weil sich Klimaangst nicht wie etwas anfühlt, mit dem sich junge Menschen beschäftigen sollten. Als junger Mensch sollte ich mir keine Sorgen über die Ignoranz und Untätigkeit von Regierungen im Kampf gegen den Klimawandel machen müssen. Die Klimaangst ist eine unnötige Last auf den Schultern junger Menschen.

Was können wir gegen die Klimaangst tun? 

Zum einen brauchen wir unbedingt mehr erschwingliche und zugängliche Gesundheitsdienste für Menschen mit mentalen Problemen. 

Wenn die Regierungen wirklich zeigen wollen, dass sie die Klimaangst ernst nehmen, dann sollten sie alles in ihrer Macht stehende tun, um die psychische Gesundheitsversorgung zu verbessern. Dazu gehört auch, dass mehr Mittel für die Erforschung von mentalen Problemen bereitgestellt werden. 

Zum Glück habe ich festgestellt, dass unsere Generation trotz aller Hindernisse widerstandsfähig ist. Nach zweijähriger Abwesenheit haben wir alle miterlebt, wie Klimaaktivisten für den ersten globalen Klimastreik seit der Pandemie auf die Straße gegangen sind. 

Ich habe für mich selbst herausgefunden, dass die Teilnahme an einer Kundgebung mich die vielen negativen Gefühle überwinden lässt, die ich mit dem Klimawandel verbinde. Ich fühle mich gestärkt und habe das Gefühl, dazuzugehören, weil ich sehe, dass meine Generation diesen Kampf gemeinsam führt. Das hilft mir wirklich, mich ein bisschen zu beruhigen.

Letztendlich können wir die Klimaangst als eine der Ursachen für psychische Probleme aber nur beseitigen, wenn wir den Klimawandel eindämmen. Wir brauchen klare Klimaschutzmaßnahmen und zwar jetzt. (Lies nach, wie die Grünen/EFA auf Klimamaßnahmen in der EU gedrängt haben).

Wir müssen den Druck aufrechterhalten. Unser mächtigstes Instrument, um Entscheidungsträger*innen zur Rechenschaft zu ziehen, ist es, den Kampf für Klimagerechtigkeit auf die Straße zu tragen. Wir müssen von Politikerinnen und Politikern verlangen, dass sie jetzt handeln – nicht nur um unserer geistigen Gesundheit willen, sondern für eine lebenswerte Zukunft auf unserem schönen Planeten.

UND WIE GEHT ES NUN WEITER?

Die meisten von uns werden irgendwann in ihrem Leben ein mentales Problem haben. Jeder junge Mensch, der Therapie benötigt, hat unabhängig von seiner finanziellen Situation das Recht auf Zugang zu angemessenen Therapieangeboten.

Wir brauchen eine EU-Strategie für psychische Gesundheit. Wir brauchen psychische Gesundheitsdienste, die erschwinglich und für alle zugänglich sind. Vor allem für die Bedürftigsten, für Migrant*innen und für alle, die Schutz benötigen. 

Um die Krise der mentalen Gesundheit junger Menschen zu lösen, brauchen wir:

Uns ist klar, dass es keine schnellen Lösungen für große Probleme wie Arbeitslosigkeit, Wohnungsnot und die Klimakrise gibt. Doch unsere Geschichten zeigen, dass die Sorgen junger Menschen um ihre mentale Gesundheit ernst genommen werden sollten. Wir haben genug von der COVID-19-Pandemie. Und wir haben genug von der Pandemie der psychischen Gesundheit. 

Europa befindet sich jetzt eindeutig an einem Scheideweg. Entweder ignorieren die EU-Regierungen weiterhin die Ursachen für die psychische Gesundheit oder sie beginnen zu handeln. Wir hoffen, dass unsere Geschichten ihnen einen Denkanstoß gegeben haben. 

Und jetzt seid ihr dran!

Wie geht es eurer mentalen Gesundheit seit Beginn der Pandemie? Beeinflusst der Klimawandel auch eure mentale Gesundheit?

Wir würden uns freuen, wenn ihr euch mit uns unter diesem Instagram Post austauscht. Wir warten in den Kommentaren auf euch – wir sehen uns also dort!

Solidarity with the people in Ukraine – what we can do now to help

On February 24th Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, with coordinated assaults throughout the country. This is an unprecedented attack against a European country. Against a democracy. Against peace in Europe.

It is now up to us to speak with a united and strong voice against this aggression.

The European Union stands united with Ukraine

We as Greens/EFA in the European Parliament strongly condemn these unprovoked actions by Russia and stand firmly with Ukraine. Ukraine’s sovereignty as a democratic nation and its territorial integrity are undisputable. Russia’s military actions are in direct violation of international law and should stop immediately.

It is now up to us, the European Union, to show our solidarity with Ukraine in a swift and coordinated response. We cannot let Putin succeed in his attempt to bring down Europe’s peace architecture. Given his continued escalation, further targeted and hard-hitting sanctions must be brought to bear immediately.

Our hearts go out to the people of Ukraine, who now face stark realities. We must strengthen our financial, economic and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine and be prepared to provide a safe haven to people fleeing the invasion. All the above will test the resolve, unity and solidarity of the European Union. Collectively, we are convinced we have the means and the will to meet the challenge.

Please follow our social media channels for any developing news.

How to help people in the Ukraine – links and resources

Now is the time to show our support and solidarity to the people in and fleeing from Ukraine. Now is the time to show them they are not alone.

There are many things you can do to help the people in the Ukraine:

  • Donate
  • Attend a demonstration
  • Check on your friends and family who might be affected by the situation
  • Share news and ways to help
  • Check your sources and be mindful of misinformation

If you can, donate to these organisations to help people in and fleeing Ukraine:

Spot the tax haven? Avoiding the blacklist is a game for zero tax countries

The EU’s latest ‘blacklist’ for tax havens has just been released, but some of the biggest names are not on the list. Certain territories are getting away with offering 0% tax rates – meaning multi-billion dollar corporations who register there can pay no tax (while the rest of us are contributing our fair share).

It’s time for the EU to take its own blacklist seriously and stop treating tax avoidance like a game, write Kira Peter-Hansen and Ernest Urtasun.

Twice a year, European countries get together to decide which countries outside of the EU are going to make it into the so-called ’blacklist’, a list of the biggest tax havens in the world. The threat of being added to the tax haven blacklist is supposed to dissuade countries from offering low tax rates as a perk for corporations. Tax havens rob all of us from the benefit of tax money that should rightfully be paid in countries where these corporations actually do business.

The newest version of the EU’s tax haven blacklist came out today. There are some conspicuous names missing from the list: the Cayman Islands, Jersey, the Bahamas, the Isle of Man. These are all countries that offer corporationsa tax rate of 0% but they have not been blacklisted. There’s a game being played behind the scenes, and ordinary people are on the losing side. Let’s look into what’s really going on here.

What is a tax haven and why tax havens are bad ?

Tax havens are countries that offer extremely low tax rates to giant multinational corporations and rich individuals to help them avoid taxes in their home countries, where they would traditionally pay a fairer sum. 

So, for example, a well-known Swedish furniture brand can do most of their business in Sweden but base their headquarters in the Cayman Islands or Jersey. Does that mean that they are transferring their business to the middle of the Caribbean Sea? Not at all. What it means is that they are setting up a fictional office on a tropical island and claiming that they make all of their money there so that they can benefit from the 0% tax rate. So, while the workers of the Swedish furniture brand are diligently paying their taxes in Sweden, the owners are using a tropical paradise to escape the taxes they have to pay.  

Why are some of the world’s biggest tax havens missing from the EU’s blacklist?

In 2017, the EU started collecting the names of some of these countries that offer special benefits to the super rich in the tax haven list. The blacklist is supposed to be a tool for the EU to fight tax avoidance and to name and shame countries who create unfair tax competition.

But the catch is that they leave out some of the biggest players in the tax benefit world. Why? Because the criteria for who should be put on the list are too weak. If you don’t believe it, look at the tax haven blacklist from October. The Cayman Islands, the Seychelles, Jersey, the British Virgin Islands and other countries that offer corporationsa tax rate of 0% were missing from the blacklist. Another example is Switzerland. Even with scandals like the Suisse Secrets, Switzerland benefits from the weak criteria and isn’t listed as it should be.

There is also a weaker version of the blacklist called the grey list. It’s the blacklist’s little sibling. The grey list is for countries whose tax practices warrant further scrutiny, but who have at least made some commitment to change. Countries entering the grey list are fully aware that this is happening and they get a warning from the EU, but their intention to change their tax systems gives them a pass out of the blacklist.

If this doesn’t sound fair, it’s because it isn’t at all. Turkey has repeatedly failed to comply  with the criteria or change its tax system, but it has managed to avoid the blacklist for years now. South Dakota in the US also gives preferential tax deals to corporations. But the US is far from appearing on the blacklist, despite playing a big role in the Pandora Papers and the European Parliament asking for it to be added. Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands and the Bahamas offer big corporations a 0% tax rate but are still only making it onto the grey list because they manage to jump through the right loopholes.

How can we fix the EU’s tax haven blacklist?

All this means that the blacklist is being undermined. It should be a strong tool to fight against tax avoidance and unfair tax competition in the world. But right now it feels like a game of hide and seek, where it’s too easy for countries to be let off the hook. 

We have repeatedly asked for the criteria for blacklisting tax havens to be stronger. We’ve also called for the list to be updated in a way that is both transparent and accountable, to put an end to the political games.And we are not alone in this, the European Parliament has demanded the list be revised multiple times.

It is time for the biggest tax havens to make it onto the list. Countries offering 0% tax deals should be listed immediately. The criteria need to be properly applied both inside and outside the EU.

If this doesn’t happen, we will not be able to achieve tax justice. Large corporations will still benefit from not paying taxes and it will be EU citizens who will have to pay for a mess that their own governments have the power to fix.

‘Sportswashing’ – Why the Beijing Winter Olympics pose a threat to human rights

With the Winter Olympics starting this week in Beijing, and the FIFA World Cup in Qatar later this year, human rights organisations are sounding the alarm on ‘sportswashing’. Gwendoline Delbos Corfield MEP and Patrick Breyer MEP investigate how big sporting events operate as a distraction from persecution, mass surveillance and human rights violations.

Are mass-scale sports events being used to normalise the use of surveillance technologies in our cities? Biometric mass surveillance, like high-tech facial recognition, is on the rise – but what is the cost to our human rights?

What do sports events have to do with human rights violations?

On 4th February, the Winter Olympics will kick off in Beijing, China, against a dark backdrop of serious human rights concerns. International human rights associations have warned participants of human rights violations and security concerns linked to the games. They are calling the sports event an apparent attempt to “sportswash” away its abusive rights reputation. What’s more, there are grave security concerns about the ‘My2022’ app that participants are required to download and use. The app monitors the health and travel data of athletes, but has been found to have a “devastating” encryption flaw that leaves this sensitive data open to attack.

Later this year, the FIFA World Cup will be hosted in Qatar. The country has come under criticism for the abuse of two million migrant workers, limited press freedom, a total absence of LGBTIQ+ rights, and a male guardianship system that severely limits the basic rights of women and girls.

With this year’s two biggest sporting events being hosted by major human rights abusers, it is hard not to see this as a worrying trend that normalises a complete disregard for human rights. The effect is similar to ‘greenwashing’, where corporations use marketing to claim their environmentally-friendly credentials in order to boost their sales and image. Instead, authoritarian states are using ‘sportswashing’ to create the same positive effect for their bad public image.

Alarmingly, research shows that China and Qatar are not the only countries ‘sportswashing’ their human rights reputation. Ahead of the upcoming 2024 Paris Olympics, organisers in Europe are also exploring the possibility of using biometric mass surveillance, like facial recognition, in cities hosting major sporting events.

What would this mean for our human rights?

An Olympic-sized threat to human rights and democratic societies

One of the biggest threats for democracy and a diverse society is the use of biometric mass surveillance technology. The potential for abuse is unprecedented. These technologies threaten our right to self-determination and human dignity, for example by forcing athletes at the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing to use an app that does not handle users’ personal data in a sensitive way. These are core fundamental rights that must be respected in a democracy governed by the rule of law.

European countries are experimenting with increasingly intrusive technology, without ever demonstrating its efficiency and added-value. This is despite continuous requests for evidence. If left unregulated, they have the potential to change our societies fundamentally. It’s time to acknowledge the adverse effect of biometric surveillance methods on our fundamental rights. We need to act now before it’s too late.

The true cost of biometric surveillance: Loss of privacy, attacks on freedom of expression, division and discrimination

In order to understand the full impact on our rights, we commissioned a study to find out what exactly is at stake. According to our team of international researchers, biometric mass surveillance in public places, like the sportswashing at the Winter Olympics in Beijing, poses a risk to our rights and our privacy by:

  • resulting in the violation of our right to private life. This means that biometric data, like an image of your face on CCTV, are stored for surveillance before an offence has been committed.
  • leading to an unjustified loss of personal development and personal autonomy. Individuals who feel they are being monitored may have a tendency to censor themselves. They might modify their behaviour or avoid meeting someone in a publicly accessible place.
  • posing a genuine, ongoing and serious threat to self-determination and to dignity. Data collected through video and audio surveillance, as well as biometric characteristics that are used to identify or categorise people, relate to the human body and the human mind. They need to be protected. These rights should not be restricted in a democracy governed by the rule of law.

Our study also finds that biometric mass surveillance is not in line with our right to freedom of expression and the right to freedom of assembly:

  • By promoting self-censorship. Freedom of expression is an “essential foundation” of democracy and the rule of law. It is “one of the basic conditions for its progress” according to the European Court of Human Rights.  States have a positive obligation to ensure its effectiveness. This means giving citizens the confidence to express themselves without fear. States must not monitor them if not duly justified, necessary and framed. Chinese leaders promised to uphold these rights in light of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics but have since arrested journalists, lawyers and women’s rights activists for expressing their beliefs.

Biometric mass surveillance is also in conflict with the absolute right to hold a belief:

  • Technology that identifies or guesses the emotions or thoughts of real people can manipulate these people and encourage them to overly monitor their own behaviour. This impact contradicts the right to hold a belief, which is an absolute right. These technologies are powerful and cannot be used without the informed consent of the people concerned. Not even in cases of internal security or to prevent crime.

Biometric mass surveillance: Why data is never foolproof

The risks linked to errors and to the theft of biometric identifiers are many and they are common, to name a few:

  • Technical errors: Technology can be liable to falsely recognise or authenticate a person, or to not recognise or authenticate a person where it should. A striking example of errors is provided by an independent report, which concludes that the facial recognition system used by the London Metropolitan Police is “verifiably accurate in just 19% of cases[1], which means that “81% of ‘suspects’ flagged by [the] technology [are] innocent[2].
  • Human-based errors and weaknesses: The code behind the categories used to detect and classify people is human-based and subjective. Errors may arise. The way technology is used may itself lead to unwanted impacts, like reinforcing stereotypes.

What can sports fans do to keep enjoying the Olympics and FIFA without sportswashing? Call for an EU ban on biometric mass surveillance now!

We don’t want to live in a society in which people are tracked, judged and classified based on their appearance, identity or behaviour.

The Member States of the European Union are confronted with a crucial political choice. We must decide between maintaining the principles and values of the rule of law and the respect of human rights, or the choice to stray from this path and go down the road of division and discrimination.

Huge sports events and sportswashing cannot be used to open the door to these dangerous technologies. This is why we need the European Commission to impose a ban of biometric mass surveillance technologies in all public spaces throughout the European Union. This way we can send a strong signal against human rights violations all across the globe.

Sign the European Citizen’s Initiative #ReclaimYourFace today!


Check out our NEW STUDY:

‘Impacts of the use of Biometric and Behavioural Mass Surveillance Technologies on Human Rights and the Rule of Law’

This study includes a summary of the legal framework that regulates the use of such technologies, in addition to an analysis of the ways in which these technologies impact on human rights and on the rule of law.

What is biometric mass surveillance?

When biometric data, for example highly sensitive data about our body or behaviour collected by cctv-cameras, is monitored, tracked and processed in one way or the other, we call it Biometric mass surveillance. When used to scan individuals or groups in an indiscriminate or arbitrarily targeted manner in public or publicly accessible spaces (a form of mass surveillance), biometric processing violates a wide range of fundamental rights.

What is sportswashing’?

Sportswashing refers to the practice of an individual, group, corporation, or a state using major international sports events to improve its reputation and public image, and to direct attention away from wide-spread human rights violations. Countries like China and Qatar have been under scrutiny for using lucrative sports events as an opportunity to launder their image.

Human rights organisations have criticised China, for instance, on its deteriorating human rights situation, including the on-going mass persecution of Uyghurs in Xinjiang, and the clampdown on freedom of speech.

Did you know? Many European cities and regions are already experimenting with these dangerous technologies. Last year, as an effort to promote privacy and human rights, we got together with a team of international experts to understand where biometric mass surveillance is put to use at this very moment in different European cities and states.

Check out our study and an interactive map on the current practises here!

Close menu